Aerosol delivery and modern mechanical ventilation -: In vitro/in vivo evaluation

被引:156
作者
Miller, DD
Amin, MM
Palmer, LB
Shah, AR
Smaldone, GC
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Hlth Sci Ctr 040, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Div Pulm & Critical Care Med, Dept Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Care, Stony Brook, NY USA
关键词
aerosolized antibiotics; nebulizers; bronchodilators; humidification; sputum;
D O I
10.1164/rccm.200210-1167OC
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aerosol delivery via a mechanical ventilator remains unregulated with no standards for drug delivery to intubated patients. Bench models predicting drug delivery have not been validated in vivo. For modern ventilator designs, we chose to identify, on the bench, the most important variables affecting aerosol delivery and to correlate in vitro predictions of aerosol delivery with in vivo end points independent of patient response. Test aerosols of albuterol and antibiotics were compared. Bench measurements of inhaled mass (percentage of nebulizer charge, mean +/- SEM) ranged from 5.7 +/- 0.5% to 37.4 +/- 1.6%, with breath-actuated nebulization and humidity identified as the most important factors determining aerosol delivery. In patients, sputum levels of deposited antibiotics varied from 1.10 to 19.6 mug/ ml/mg. Variation in sputum levels correlated with predictions from the in vitro model. Aerosol delivery in. ventilated patients can be efficient and reproducible only if defined ventilator parameters are tightly controlled. Key parameters can be determined via in vitro bench testing defining delivery standards for clinical trials of drugs with narrow therapeutic/toxicity ratios.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1209
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, RESP CARE
  • [2] Bronchodilator delivery with metered-dose inhalers in mechanically-ventilated patients
    Dhand, R
    Tobin, MJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1996, 9 (03) : 585 - 595
  • [3] Inhaled bronchodilator therapy in mechanically ventilated patients
    Dhand, R
    Tobin, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 156 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [4] ALBUTEROL DELIVERY IN A MODEL OF MECHANICAL VENTILATION - COMPARISON OF METERED-DOSE INHALER AND NEBULIZER EFFICIENCY
    DIOT, P
    MORRA, L
    SMALDONE, GC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 152 (04) : 1391 - 1394
  • [5] PRESSURIZED AEROSOL VERSUS JET AEROSOL DELIVERY TO MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS - COMPARISON OF DOSE TO THE LUNGS
    FULLER, HD
    DOLOVICH, MB
    POSMITUCK, G
    PACK, WW
    NEWHOUSE, MT
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1990, 141 (02): : 440 - 444
  • [6] QUANTITATIVE DEPOSITION OF AEROSOLIZED GENTAMICIN IN CYSTIC-FIBROSIS
    ILOWITE, JS
    GORVOY, JD
    SMALDONE, GC
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1987, 136 (06): : 1445 - 1449
  • [7] Aerosol delivery during continuous nebulization
    McPeck, M
    Tandon, R
    Hughes, K
    Smaldone, GC
    [J]. CHEST, 1997, 111 (05) : 1200 - 1205
  • [8] MILLER D, 2002, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V165, pA377
  • [9] O'Riordan T. G., 1994, RESP CARE, V39, P1162
  • [10] DELIVERY OF A NEBULIZED AEROSOL TO A LUNG MODEL DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION - EFFECT OF VENTILATOR SETTINGS AND NEBULIZER TYPE, POSITION, AND VOLUME OF FILL
    ODOHERTY, MJ
    THOMAS, SHL
    PAGE, CJ
    TREACHER, DF
    NUNAN, TO
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1992, 146 (02): : 383 - 388