Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging for the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules

被引:17
作者
He, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Xiao Yan [1 ]
Hu, Qiao [1 ]
Chen, Xue Xue [1 ]
Ling, Bing [1 ]
Wei, Hai Ming [2 ]
机构
[1] Peoples Hosp Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg, Dept Ultrasound, Nanning, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Hosp Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg, Dept Pathol, Nanning, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY | 2018年 / 9卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
thyroid nodule; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging; shear wave velocity; receiver operating characteristic curve; ULTRASONOGRAPHIC TISSUE QUANTIFICATION; IN-VIVO; ELASTOGRAPHY; UTILITY; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2018.01363
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Methods: CEUS was performed in eighty-eight thyroid nodules. The patterns of CEUS were analyzed, and ARFI was then performed. The shear wave velocities (SWVs) of the nodules and the surrounding normal thyroid tissue were obtained. The areas under the curve (AUCs) and cut-off value were obtained by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic rate of each modality were assessed and compared using pathological diagnosis. Results: Among 88 nodules, 29 nodules were malignant and 59 were benign. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic rate of CEUS were 79.3, 91.5, 82.1, 90, and 87.5%, respectively. Using a cut-off value of 2.565 m/s for SWV, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic rate for malignancy were 75.9, 94.9, 88.0, 88.9, and 88.6%, respectively. The AUC was 0.878. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic rate of CEUS in combination with ARFI were 93.1, 89.8, 81.8, 96.3, and 90.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Both CEUS and ARFI are valuable for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Combining these two methods can improve the diagnostic rate.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Ultrasonographic Thyroid Findings Suspicious for Malignancy [J].
Azar, Nami ;
Lance, Craig ;
Nakamoto, Dean ;
Michael, Claire ;
Wasman, Jay .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 41 (12) :1107-1114
[2]   Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging for Evaluation of the Thyroid Gland [J].
Cepero Calvete, Angela ;
Berna Mestre, J. Dios ;
Rodriguez Gonzalez, Jose Manuel ;
Saez Martinez, Elena ;
Torregrosa Sala, Begona ;
Rios Zambudio, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (06) :1031-1040
[3]  
[陈敏华 Chen Minhua], 2005, [中华超声影像学杂志, Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography], V14, P116
[4]   Real-time Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Thyroid Nodules [J].
Friedrich-Rust, M. ;
Sperber, A. ;
Holzer, K. ;
Diener, J. ;
Gruenwald, F. ;
Badenhoop, K. ;
Weber, S. ;
Kriener, S. ;
Herrmann, E. ;
Bechstein, W. O. ;
Zeuzem, S. ;
Bojunga, J. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2010, 118 (09) :602-609
[5]   Phantom experiment and clinical utility of quantitative shear wave elastography for differentiating thyroid nodules [J].
Fukuhara, Takahiro ;
Matsuda, Eriko ;
Fujiwara, Kazunori ;
Tanimura, Chika ;
Izawa, Shoichiro ;
Kataoka, Hideyuki ;
Kitano, Hiroya .
ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2014, 61 (06) :615-621
[6]   Changing concepts in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules [J].
Gharib, H .
ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 26 (04) :777-+
[7]  
Gilliland FD, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V79, P564, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970201)79:3<564::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-0
[9]   ULTRASOUND CARDIOGRAPHY - CONTRAST STUDIES IN ANATOMY AND FUNCTION [J].
GRAMIAK, R ;
SHAH, PM ;
KRAMER, DH .
RADIOLOGY, 1969, 92 (05) :939-+
[10]   Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) imaging for the distinction between benign and malignant thyroid nodules [J].
Hamidi, Cihad ;
Goya, Cemil ;
Hattapoglu, Salih ;
Uslukaya, Omer ;
Teke, Memik ;
Durmaz, Mehmet Sedat ;
Yavuz, Mehmet Siddik ;
Hamidi, Arif ;
Tekbas, Guven .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (06) :579-583