The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults A prospective validation study

被引:5
作者
Kiesewetter, I. [1 ]
Bartels, U. [2 ,3 ]
Bauer, A. [1 ,4 ]
Schneider, G. [2 ,5 ]
Pilge, S. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Helios Clin Wuppertal, Dept Anaesthesiol, Wuppertal, Germany
[3] Westkustenkliniken Brunsbuttel & Heide GmbH, Clin Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Heide Holstein, Germany
[4] RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Inst Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Rosenheim, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Munich, Germany
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 2019年 / 68卷 / 12期
关键词
Pain score; Pain measurement; Behavioral rating scale; Intensive care unit; Validation study; CPOT; SCALE; UNIT; TRANSLATION; ADAPTATION; BPS;
D O I
10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The implementation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation tool (CPOT) in intensive care units (ICU) has been associated with more frequent pain assessments, a reduced number of complications, and improved administration of analgesics and sedatives. So far no German translation exists. Translating this tool into foreign languages requires further validation testing. Objective. The aim of this prospective observational validation study was to translate the original version of the CPOT according to scientific principles for translation and to establish the validity and reliability of the German translation of CPOT for critically ill adult patients. Material andmethods. A total of 292 cardiac surgery patients from 2 ICUs of 2 German university teaching hospitals were included (114 patients at center 1 and 178 patients at center 2). Of the included patients 22.6% were female and 76.4% were male with a mean age of 68.5 years +/- 9.3 SD. Pain was evaluated with the CPOT, the Bhavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and with the Numeric Rating scale (NRS) at three time points (1. intubated+ sedated, 2. intubated+ awake, 3. extubated+ awake) at rest and during nociceptive stimulus (positioning). Assessments were made separately by trained physicians and nursing staff. Results. Good results for interrater reliability and internal consistency could be demonstrated (weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.73, Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.8). Spearman correlation between CPOT and NRS was moderate but significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to obtain optimal thresholds of CPOT to detect pain revealed different results during rest and stimulus and in intubated and extubated patients. Conclusion. The validated German CPOT translation is a reliable tool for pain assessment in cardiac ICU patients in the absence of patients' ability for self-reporting. The use of this German version of CPOT now allows a better international comparability of corresponding data in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 842
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Emergency department critical care unit for critically ill cardiovascular patients: An observation study
    Fu, Ken-Hui
    Chen, Yin-Ru
    Fan, Ju-Shin
    Chen, Yen-Chia
    Huang, Hsien-Hao
    How, Chorng-Kuang
    Yen, David Hung-Tsang
    Chen, Shih-Ann
    Huang, Mu-Shun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 80 (04) : 233 - 244
  • [42] A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and the Behavioral Pain Scale for Pain Assessment among Unconscious Patients
    Nazari, Roghieh
    Froelicher, Erika Sivarjan
    Nia, Hamid Sharif
    Hajihosseini, Fatemeh
    Mousazadeh, Noushin
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 26 (04) : 472 - 476
  • [43] Validity and Reliability of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool: A Replication Study
    Keane, Kathleen Marie
    [J]. PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2013, 14 (04) : E216 - E225
  • [44] Pain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Comparison of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT)
    Rijkenberg, Saskia
    Stilma, Willemke
    Bosman, Robert J.
    van der Meer, Nardo J.
    van der Voort, Peter H. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2017, 31 (04) : 1227 - 1234
  • [45] Comparison of Two Pain Scales: Behavioral Pain Scale and Critical-care Pain Observation Tool During Invasive and Noninvasive Procedures in Intensive Care Unit-admitted Patients
    Gomarverdi, Shiva
    Sedighie, Ladan
    Seifrabiei, Mohamad Ali
    Nikooseresht, Mahshid
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY RESEARCH, 2019, 24 (02) : 151 - 155
  • [46] The Critical care Pain Observation Tool is reliable in non-agitated but not in agitated intubated patients
    Chookalayia, Hoda
    Heidarzadeh, Mehdi
    Hassanpour-Darghah, Mohammad
    Aghamohammadi-Kalkhoran, Masoomeh
    Karimollahi, Mansoreh
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2018, 44 : 123 - 128
  • [47] BEHAVIORAL PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR CRITICALLY ILL ADULTS UNABLE TO SELF-REPORT PAIN
    Rose, Louise
    Haslam, Lynn
    Dale, Craig
    Knechtel, Leasa
    McGillion, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 22 (03) : 246 - 255
  • [48] Validation of the Nociception Level Index forthe Detection of Nociception and Pain in Critically Ill Adults: Protocol for an Observational Study
    Gelinas, Celine
    Shahiri, T. Shiva
    Wang, Han Ting
    Gallani, Maria Cecilia
    Oulehri, Walid
    Laporta, Denny
    Richebe, Philippe
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2025, 14
  • [49] Content validation of behaviours and autonomic responses for the assessment of pain in critically ill adults with a brain injury
    Gelinas, Celine
    Puntillo, Kathleen A.
    Boitor, Madalina
    Berube, Melanie
    Topolovec-Vranic, Jane
    Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie
    Joffe, Aaron M.
    Richard-Lalonde, Melissa
    Bernard, Francis
    Streiner, David L.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 31 (03) : 145 - 151
  • [50] Prospective validation of Sophia observation withdrawal symptoms: A paediatric delirium scale in critically ill children in Denmark
    Stenkjaer, Rikke Louise
    Egerod, Ingrid
    Moszkowicz, Mala
    Ista, Erwin
    Greisen, Gorm
    Weis, Janne
    Pagsberg, Anne Katrine
    Herling, Suzanne Forsyth
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 37 (03) : 400 - 406