The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults A prospective validation study

被引:5
作者
Kiesewetter, I. [1 ]
Bartels, U. [2 ,3 ]
Bauer, A. [1 ,4 ]
Schneider, G. [2 ,5 ]
Pilge, S. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Helios Clin Wuppertal, Dept Anaesthesiol, Wuppertal, Germany
[3] Westkustenkliniken Brunsbuttel & Heide GmbH, Clin Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Heide Holstein, Germany
[4] RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Inst Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Rosenheim, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Munich, Germany
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 2019年 / 68卷 / 12期
关键词
Pain score; Pain measurement; Behavioral rating scale; Intensive care unit; Validation study; CPOT; SCALE; UNIT; TRANSLATION; ADAPTATION; BPS;
D O I
10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The implementation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation tool (CPOT) in intensive care units (ICU) has been associated with more frequent pain assessments, a reduced number of complications, and improved administration of analgesics and sedatives. So far no German translation exists. Translating this tool into foreign languages requires further validation testing. Objective. The aim of this prospective observational validation study was to translate the original version of the CPOT according to scientific principles for translation and to establish the validity and reliability of the German translation of CPOT for critically ill adult patients. Material andmethods. A total of 292 cardiac surgery patients from 2 ICUs of 2 German university teaching hospitals were included (114 patients at center 1 and 178 patients at center 2). Of the included patients 22.6% were female and 76.4% were male with a mean age of 68.5 years +/- 9.3 SD. Pain was evaluated with the CPOT, the Bhavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and with the Numeric Rating scale (NRS) at three time points (1. intubated+ sedated, 2. intubated+ awake, 3. extubated+ awake) at rest and during nociceptive stimulus (positioning). Assessments were made separately by trained physicians and nursing staff. Results. Good results for interrater reliability and internal consistency could be demonstrated (weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.73, Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.8). Spearman correlation between CPOT and NRS was moderate but significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to obtain optimal thresholds of CPOT to detect pain revealed different results during rest and stimulus and in intubated and extubated patients. Conclusion. The validated German CPOT translation is a reliable tool for pain assessment in cardiac ICU patients in the absence of patients' ability for self-reporting. The use of this German version of CPOT now allows a better international comparability of corresponding data in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 842
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of a Korean Translated Version of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for ICU Patients
    Kwak, Eun-Mi
    Oh, Heeyoung
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF NURSING, 2012, 42 (01) : 76 - 84
  • [32] Validation of two Chinese-version pain observation tools in conscious and unconscious critically ill patients
    Cheng, Li-Hua
    Tsai, Yun-Fang
    Wang, Cheng-Hsu
    Tsay, Pei-Kwei
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2018, 44 : 115 - 122
  • [33] Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and Vital Signs in Relation to the Sensory and Affective Components of Pain During Mediastinal Tube Removal in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit Adults
    Boitor, Madalina
    Fiola, Jacinthe Lachance
    Gelinas, Celine
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2016, 31 (05) : 425 - 432
  • [34] Impact of implementing the critical-care pain observation tool in the adult intensive care unit: A nonrandomised stepped-wedge trial
    Alotni, Majid A.
    Sim, Jenny
    Chu, Ginger
    Guilhermino, Michelle
    Barker, Daniel
    Szwec, Stuart
    Fernandez, Ritin
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2025, 38 (02)
  • [35] Prospective assessment of a score for assessing basic critical-care transthoracic echocardiography skills in ventilated critically ill patients
    Mathieu Jozwiak
    Xavier Monnet
    Raphaël Cinotti
    Fréderic Bontemps
    Jean Reignier
    Guillaume Belliard
    Annals of Intensive Care, 4
  • [36] P-CPOT: An Adaptation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients
    Tao, Hong
    Galagarza, Sherise R.
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2020, 21 (02) : 172 - 178
  • [37] Translation, adaptation, and validation of the behavioral pain scale and the critical-care pain observational tools in Taiwan
    Hsiung, Nai-Huan
    Yang, Yen
    Lee, Ming Shinn
    Dalal, Koustuv
    Smith, Graeme D.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 661 - 669
  • [38] Validation of Two Pain Assessment Tools Using a Standardized Nociceptive Stimulation in Critically Ill Adults
    Klein, Cristini
    Caumo, Wolnei
    Gelinas, Celine
    Patines, Valeria
    Pilger, Tatiana
    Lopes, Alexandra
    Backes, Fabiane Neiva
    Villas-Boas, Debora Feijo
    Rios Vieira, Silvia Regina
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 56 (04) : 594 - 601
  • [39] Validation of the Polish version of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) to assess pain intensity in adult, intubated intensive care unit patients: the POL-CPOT study
    Kotfis, Katarzyna
    Zegan-Baranska, Malgorzata
    Strzelbicka, Marta
    Safranow, Krzysztof
    Zukowski, Maciej
    Ely, E. Wesley
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 14 (04) : 880 - 889
  • [40] Comparison of the Zurich Observation Pain Assessment with the Behavioural Pain Scale and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool in nonverbal patients in the intensive care unit: A prospective observational study
    Froehlich, Martin R.
    Meyer, Gabriele
    Spirig, Rebecca
    Bachmann, Lucas M.
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2020, 60