The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults A prospective validation study

被引:5
|
作者
Kiesewetter, I. [1 ]
Bartels, U. [2 ,3 ]
Bauer, A. [1 ,4 ]
Schneider, G. [2 ,5 ]
Pilge, S. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Helios Clin Wuppertal, Dept Anaesthesiol, Wuppertal, Germany
[3] Westkustenkliniken Brunsbuttel & Heide GmbH, Clin Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Heide Holstein, Germany
[4] RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Inst Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Rosenheim, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Munich, Germany
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 2019年 / 68卷 / 12期
关键词
Pain score; Pain measurement; Behavioral rating scale; Intensive care unit; Validation study; CPOT; SCALE; UNIT; TRANSLATION; ADAPTATION; BPS;
D O I
10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The implementation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation tool (CPOT) in intensive care units (ICU) has been associated with more frequent pain assessments, a reduced number of complications, and improved administration of analgesics and sedatives. So far no German translation exists. Translating this tool into foreign languages requires further validation testing. Objective. The aim of this prospective observational validation study was to translate the original version of the CPOT according to scientific principles for translation and to establish the validity and reliability of the German translation of CPOT for critically ill adult patients. Material andmethods. A total of 292 cardiac surgery patients from 2 ICUs of 2 German university teaching hospitals were included (114 patients at center 1 and 178 patients at center 2). Of the included patients 22.6% were female and 76.4% were male with a mean age of 68.5 years +/- 9.3 SD. Pain was evaluated with the CPOT, the Bhavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and with the Numeric Rating scale (NRS) at three time points (1. intubated+ sedated, 2. intubated+ awake, 3. extubated+ awake) at rest and during nociceptive stimulus (positioning). Assessments were made separately by trained physicians and nursing staff. Results. Good results for interrater reliability and internal consistency could be demonstrated (weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.73, Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.8). Spearman correlation between CPOT and NRS was moderate but significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to obtain optimal thresholds of CPOT to detect pain revealed different results during rest and stimulus and in intubated and extubated patients. Conclusion. The validated German CPOT translation is a reliable tool for pain assessment in cardiac ICU patients in the absence of patients' ability for self-reporting. The use of this German version of CPOT now allows a better international comparability of corresponding data in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 842
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Implementing the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool on Nurses' Performance in Assessing and. Managing Pain in the Critically Ill Patients
    Modanloo, Mahnaz
    Mohsenpour, Afsaneh
    Rahmani, Hossein
    Moghaddam, Shahram
    Khoddam, Homeira
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 23 (04) : 165 - 169
  • [22] Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) in pediatric patients undergoing orthopedic surgery
    Li, Mandy M. J.
    Ocay, Don Daniel
    Larche, Cynthia L.
    Vickers, Kelsey
    Saran, Neil
    Ouellet, Jean A.
    Gelinas, Celine
    Ferland, Catherine E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN-REVUE CANADIENNE DE LA DOULEUR, 2023, 7 (01):
  • [23] The Behavior Pain Assessment Tool for critically ill adults: a validation study in 28 countries
    Gelinas, Celine
    Puntillo, Kathleen A.
    Levin, Pavel
    Azoulay, Elie
    PAIN, 2017, 158 (05) : 811 - 821
  • [24] Accuracy of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in critically ill conscious and unconscious patients: Prospective, observational study
    Severgnini P.
    Pelosi P.
    Contino E.
    Serafinelli E.
    Novario R.
    Chiaranda M.
    Journal of Intensive Care, 4 (1)
  • [25] Sensitivity and Specificity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for the Detection of Pain in Intubated Adults After Cardiac Surgery
    Gelinas, Celine
    Harel, Francois
    Fillion, Lise
    Puntillo, Kathleen A.
    Johnston, C. Celeste
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2009, 37 (01) : 58 - 67
  • [26] TRANSLATION INTO SPANISH AND CULTURAL ADAPTATION OF THE CRITICAL-CARE PAIN OBSERVATION TOOL
    Arroyo-Novoa, Carmen Mabel
    Figueroa-Ramos, Milagros, I
    Puntillo, Kathleen A.
    Gelinas, Celine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 29 (03) : 226 - 232
  • [27] Verification of the critical-care pain observation tool in conscious patients with hemiparesis or cognitive dysfunction
    Liu, Yu-Tse
    Lee, Cheng-Chi
    Chen, Ching-Chang
    Chiu, Yun-Han
    Liu, Zhuo-Hao
    Wang, Yu-Chi
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 65 : 91 - 97
  • [28] Can the critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT) be used to assess pain in delirious ICU patients?
    Rijkenberg, Saskia
    van der Voort, Peter H. J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (05) : E285 - E287
  • [29] Reliability and Validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool: A Rapid Synthesis of Evidence
    Stamp, Ronald
    Tucker, Lissa
    Tohid, Hiba
    Gray, Richard
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2018, 26 (02) : 378 - 397
  • [30] Prospective assessment of a score for assessing basic critical-care transthoracic echocardiography skills in ventilated critically ill patients
    Jozwiak, Mathieu
    Monnet, Xavier
    Cinotti, Raphael
    Bontemps, Frederic
    Reignier, Jean
    Belliard, Guillaume
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2014, 4 : 1 - 8