The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults A prospective validation study

被引:5
|
作者
Kiesewetter, I. [1 ]
Bartels, U. [2 ,3 ]
Bauer, A. [1 ,4 ]
Schneider, G. [2 ,5 ]
Pilge, S. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Helios Clin Wuppertal, Dept Anaesthesiol, Wuppertal, Germany
[3] Westkustenkliniken Brunsbuttel & Heide GmbH, Clin Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Heide Holstein, Germany
[4] RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Inst Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Rosenheim, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Munich, Germany
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 2019年 / 68卷 / 12期
关键词
Pain score; Pain measurement; Behavioral rating scale; Intensive care unit; Validation study; CPOT; SCALE; UNIT; TRANSLATION; ADAPTATION; BPS;
D O I
10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The implementation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation tool (CPOT) in intensive care units (ICU) has been associated with more frequent pain assessments, a reduced number of complications, and improved administration of analgesics and sedatives. So far no German translation exists. Translating this tool into foreign languages requires further validation testing. Objective. The aim of this prospective observational validation study was to translate the original version of the CPOT according to scientific principles for translation and to establish the validity and reliability of the German translation of CPOT for critically ill adult patients. Material andmethods. A total of 292 cardiac surgery patients from 2 ICUs of 2 German university teaching hospitals were included (114 patients at center 1 and 178 patients at center 2). Of the included patients 22.6% were female and 76.4% were male with a mean age of 68.5 years +/- 9.3 SD. Pain was evaluated with the CPOT, the Bhavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and with the Numeric Rating scale (NRS) at three time points (1. intubated+ sedated, 2. intubated+ awake, 3. extubated+ awake) at rest and during nociceptive stimulus (positioning). Assessments were made separately by trained physicians and nursing staff. Results. Good results for interrater reliability and internal consistency could be demonstrated (weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.73, Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.8). Spearman correlation between CPOT and NRS was moderate but significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to obtain optimal thresholds of CPOT to detect pain revealed different results during rest and stimulus and in intubated and extubated patients. Conclusion. The validated German CPOT translation is a reliable tool for pain assessment in cardiac ICU patients in the absence of patients' ability for self-reporting. The use of this German version of CPOT now allows a better international comparability of corresponding data in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 842
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adultsA prospective validation studyDie Deutsche Version des Critical-Care-Pain-Observation-ToolsEine prospektive Validierungsstudie
    I. Kiesewetter
    U. Bartels
    A. Bauer
    G. Schneider
    S. Pilge
    Der Anaesthesist, 2019, 68 : 836 - 842
  • [2] Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in brain-injured critically ill adults
    Joffe, Aaron M.
    McNulty, Bridgett
    Boitor, Madalina
    Marsh, Rebekah
    Gelinas, Celine
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 36 : 76 - 80
  • [3] Validation of The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for the detection of oral-pharyngeal pain in critically ill adults
    Dale, Craig M.
    Prendergast, Virginia
    Gelinas, Celine
    Rose, Louise
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 48 : 334 - 338
  • [4] Validation of the Dutch version of the critical-care pain observation tool
    Stilma, Willemke
    Rijkenberg, Saskia
    Feijen, Hilde M.
    Maaskant, Jolanda M.
    Endeman, Henrik
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 24 (03) : 132 - 140
  • [5] A preliminary validation of the Swedish version of the critical-care pain observation tool in adults
    Damstrom, D. Nurnberg
    Saboonchi, F.
    Sackey, P. V.
    Bjorling, G.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 55 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [6] Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool With Seriously Ill Patients
    Ross, Melody
    Boitor, Madalina
    Gelinas, Celine
    JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2016, 18 (05) : 413 - 420
  • [7] Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
    Marques, Rita
    Araujo, Filipa
    Fernandes, Marisa
    Freitas, Jose
    Dixe, Maria Anjos
    Gelinas, Celine
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [8] Pain Assessment Using the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in Chinese Critically Ill Ventilated Adults
    Li, Qingdong
    Wan, Xianyao
    Gu, Chunmei
    Yu, Yang
    Huang, Wei
    Li, Suwei
    Zhang, Yongli
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 48 (05) : 975 - 982
  • [9] Validation of a Chinese version critical-care pain observation tool in nonintubated and intubated critically ill patients: Two cross-sectional studies
    Chen, Jie
    Hu, Fen
    Yang, Jian
    Wu, Xiao-Ying
    Feng, Yi
    Zhan, Yan-Chun
    An, You-Zhong
    Lu, Qian
    Zhang, Hai-Yan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (15-16) : 2824 - 2832
  • [10] Implementation of the critical-care pain observation tool on pain assessment/management nursing practices in an intensive care unit with nonverbal critically ill adults: a before and after study
    Gelinas, Celine
    Arbour, Caroline
    Michaud, Cecile
    Valliant, Francine
    Desjardins, Sylvie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2011, 48 (12) : 1495 - 1504