Are Pasteurized Autografts Durable for Reconstructions After Bone Tumor Resections?

被引:28
|
作者
Lee, Seung Yong [1 ]
Jeon, Dae-Geun [1 ]
Cho, Wan Hyeong [1 ]
Song, Won Seok [1 ]
Kim, Bum Suk [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 215-4 Gongneung Dong, Seoul 139706, South Korea
关键词
PROSTHESIS COMPOSITE; FROZEN AUTOGRAFT; MALIGNANT BONE; ALLOGRAFT; PEDICLE; GRAFTS; TIBIA;
D O I
10.1007/s11999.0000000000000100
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Pasteurized autograft is regarded as a biologic reconstructive option for managing bone defects after tumor resection; however, reports on long-term outcomes from large patient series are scarce. Contrary to previous favorable reports, we have observed many patients with failures, in particular as the duration of followup increased. Because pasteurized autografts are used in many countries as a reconstruction option, we wished to formally evaluate patients who underwent this approach at one specialty center. Questions/purposes (1) What is the graft survival and what proportion of patients achieved union when pasteurized autografts were used for bone defects after tumor resection? (2) What are the complications and causes of graft removal? (3) What factors are related to the likelihood of union and graft survival? (4) What is the survival and cause of failure by type of pasteurized autograft reconstruction? Methods Over a 26-year period from 1988 to 2013, we performed 1358 tumor resections in our center. Of these, 353 were reconstructed with pasteurized autograft. Other reconstructions included endoprostheses (508 patients), instant arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail and bone cement (286 patients), allografts (97 patients), and resection only (114 patients). During the period in question, we generally used this approach when tumor showed an osteoblastic pattern and less than one-third cortical destruction in osteolytic tumor. We generally avoided this approach when the tumor showed an extensive osteolytic pattern. We excluded 75 (21% [75 of 353]) patients, 21 (6% [21 of 353]) for incomplete clinical data and 54 (15% [54 of 353]) with a followup < 2 years or those lost to followup leaving 278 autografts eligible. The mean followup was 113 months (range, 25-295 months). Of these 278 patients, 242 patients had primary bone sarcomas, 22 patients had soft tissue tumor invading bone, seven patients had metastatic carcinoma, and seven patients had aggressive benign bone tumors. From a chart review, we obtained the age, sex, location, tumor volume, histologic diagnosis, use of chemotherapy, graft length, fixation modality, type of pasteurized bone used, proportion of union, complications, and oncologic outcome of the patients. In total, 377 junctional sites were assessed for union with serial radiographs. We defined junctions showing union < 2 years as union and > 2 years as delayed union. We grouped our patients into type of pasteurized bone use: pasteurized autograft-prosthesis composites (PPCs) were performed in 149, intercalary grafts in 71, hemicortical grafts in 15, osteoarticular in 12, and fusion of a joint in 31 patients. The endpoint of interest included removal of the autograft with implant loosening, infection, fracture of the graft, or any reoperation resulting in removal. Survival of the graft was determined by Kaplan-Meier plot and intergroup differences were determined using log-rank test. Results Five, 10-, and 20-year survival of 278 autografts was 73% +/- 5.5%, 59% +/- 6.7%, and 40% +/- 13.6%, respectively. Of 278 autografts, 105 (38%) were removed with complications. Cause of removal included infection in 13% (33 patients), nonunion in 7% (18 patients), fracture of graft in 6% (16 patients), resorption of the graft in 5% (14 patients), and local recurrence in 4% (11 patients). Univariate survival analysis revealed that patient age <= 15 years (p = 0.027; hazard ratio [HR], 1.541), male sex (p = 0.004; HR, 1.810), and pelvic location (p = 0.05; HR, 2.518) were associated with graft removal. The 20-year survival rate of osteoarticular and hemicortical methods was 92% (95% confidence interval, -15.6% to +8.3%) and 80% +/- 20%, respectively. For intercalary and fusion, it was 46% +/- 15% and 28% +/- 22%, respectively, although for PPC, it was 37% +/- 22%. Log-rank survival analysis showed the osteoarticular and hemicortical groups had better graft survival compared with other types of reconstruction (p = 0.028; HR, 0.499). The most prevalent cause of graft removal in three major types of reconstruction was as follows: (1) PPC type was infection (30% [17 of 56]); (2) intercalary graft was infection, nonunion, and local recurrence in even proportions of 29% (86% [24 of 28]); and (3) fusion was infection (35% [six of 17]). Two hundred ten (56%) of 377 junctional sites showed union within 2 years (average, 14 months), 51 (13%) junctions showed delayed union after 2 years (average, 40 months), and the remaining 116 (31%) junctions showed nonunion. Diaphyseal junction (p = 0.029) and male sex (p = 0.004) showed a higher proportion of nonunion by univariate analysis. Conclusions Compared with the favorable short-term and small cohort reports, survival of pasteurized autograft in this long-term large cohort was disappointing. We believe that pasteurized autograft should be used with caution in children and adolescents, in the pelvic region, and in PPC form. When bone stock destruction is minimal, it is worth considering this approach for small intercalary or distal long bone reconstruction. We believe this procedure is best indicated after hemicortical resection of long bone.
引用
收藏
页码:1728 / 1737
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What Are the Complications, Function, and Survival of Tumor-devitalized Autografts Used in Patients With Limb-sparing Surgery for Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors? A Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group Multi-institutional Study
    Takeuchi, Akihiko
    Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
    Setsu, Nokitaka
    Gokita, Tabu
    Tome, Yasunori
    Asano, Naofumi
    Minami, Yusuke
    Kawashima, Hiroyuki
    Fukushima, Suguru
    Takenaka, Satoshi
    Outani, Hidetatsu
    Nakamura, Tomoki
    Tsukushi, Satoshi
    Kawamoto, Teruya
    Kidani, Teruki
    Kito, Munehisa
    Kobayashi, Hiroshi
    Morii, Takeshi
    Akiyama, Toru
    Torigoe, Tomoaki
    Hiraoka, Koji
    Nagano, Akihito
    Kakunaga, Shigeki
    Hashimoto, Kazuhiko
    Emori, Makoto
    Aiba, Hisaki
    Tanzawa, Yoshikazu
    Ueda, Takafumi
    Kawano, Hirotaka
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 481 (11) : 2110 - 2124
  • [42] Intercalary Prosthetic Reconstruction with Three-Dimensional-Printed Custom-Made Porous Component for Defects of Long Bones with Short Residual Bone Segments After Tumor Resection
    Li, Zhuangzhuang
    Lu, Minxun
    Zhang, Yuqi
    Wang, Jie
    Wang, Yitian
    Gong, Taojun
    He, Xuanhong
    Luo, Yi
    Zhou, Yong
    Min, Li
    Tu, Chongqi
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (02) : 374 - 382
  • [43] Upshifting the Ipsilateral Proximal Femur May Provide Satisfactory Reconstruction of Periacetabular Pelvic Bone Defects After Tumor Resection
    Lin, Nong
    Li, Hengyuan
    Li, Weixu
    Huang, Xin
    Liu, Meng
    Yan, Xiaobo
    Pan, Weibo
    Yang, Disheng
    Ye, Zhaoming
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (09) : 1762 - 1770
  • [44] Evaluation of Mandibular Reconstruction With Particulate Cancellous Bone Marrow and Titanium Mesh After Mandibular Resection Due to Tumor Surgery
    Miyamoto, Ikuya
    Yamashita, Yoshihiro
    Yamamoto, Noriaki
    Nogami, Shinnosuke
    Yamauchi, Kensuke
    Yoshiga, Daigo
    Kaneuji, Takeshi
    Takahashi, Tetsu
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (02) : 108 - 115
  • [45] Intercalary Allograft to Reconstruct Large-Segment Diaphysis Defects After Resection of Lower Extremity Malignant Bone Tumor
    Liu, Qing
    He, Hongbo
    Duan, Zhixi
    Zeng, Hao
    Yuan, Yuhao
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Luo, Wei
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 4299 - 4308
  • [46] MUTARS? Humero pro Femur replacement: A novel reconstructive procedure after malignant bone tumor resection of the femur in young children
    Gosheger, Georg
    Schulze, Martin
    de Vaal, Marieke Mathilda
    Theil, Christoph
    Schneider, Kristian
    Laufer, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF BONE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 35
  • [47] Intercalary Segmental Reconstruction of Long Bones After Malignant Bone Tumor Resection Using Primary Methyl Methacrylate Cement Spacer Interposition and Secondary Bone Grafting: The Induced Membrane Technique
    Villemagne, Thierry
    Bonnard, Christian
    Accadbled, Franck
    L'Kaissi, Mohamed
    de Billy, Benoit
    de Gauzy, Jerome Sales
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 31 (05) : 570 - 576
  • [48] Novel 3D-printed prosthetic composite for reconstruction of massive bone defects in lower extremities after malignant tumor resection
    Lu Yajie
    Chen Guojing
    Long Zuoyao
    Li Minghui
    Ji Chuanlei
    Wang Fengwei
    Li Huanzhang
    Lu Jianxi
    Wang Zhen
    Li Jing
    JOURNAL OF BONE ONCOLOGY, 2019, 16
  • [49] Effect of anatomic site and irradiation on the rates of revision and infection of allograft-prosthesis composites after resection of a primary bone tumor: a meta-analysis
    Auregan, Jean-Charles
    Pietton, Raphael
    Begue, Thierry
    Anract, Philippe
    Biau, David
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2016, 136 (10) : 1371 - 1380
  • [50] Does Wrist Arthrodesis With Structural Iliac Crest Bone Graft After Wide Resection of Distal Radius Giant Cell Tumor Result in Satisfactory Function and Local Control?
    Wang, Tao
    Chan, Chung Ming
    Yu, Feng
    Li, Yuan
    Niu, Xiaohui
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (03) : 767 - 775