The Effect of Chemical Surface Treatments on the Flexural Strength of Repaired Acrylic Denture Base Resin

被引:9
|
作者
Thunyakitpisal, Nonglax [1 ]
Thunyakitpisal, Pasutha [2 ,3 ]
Wiwatwarapan, Chairat [1 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Anat, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Res Unit Herbs & Nat Prod Dent Applicat, Dent Biomat Sci Program, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2011年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
Acrylic resin; flexural strength; methyl formate; methyl acetate; repair; TRANSVERSE STRENGTH; METHYLENE-CHLORIDE; BOND STRENGTH; METHACRYLATE; MICROWAVE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00688.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of the selected chemical surface treatment agents on the flexural strength of heat-polymerized acrylic resin repaired with autopolymerized acrylic resin. Materials and Methods: Ninety heat-polymerized acrylic resin specimens (Meliodent) were prepared according to ISO1567 and randomly divided into nine groups: positive and negative control groups (groups I and II), and seven experimental groups (groups III to IX). Specimens in groups II to IX were cut in the middle and beveled 45 degrees. Group III was then treated with methyl methacrylate (the liquid part of Unifast TRAD) for 180 seconds. Group IV was treated with Rebase II adhesive according to the manufacturer's instructions. Groups V to IX were treated with methyl formate, methyl acetate, and a mixture of methyl formate-methyl acetate at various concentrations (75: 25, 50: 50, 25: 75% v/v, respectively) for 15 seconds. They were then repaired with autopolymerized acrylic resin (Unifast TRAD). A three-point loading test was performed using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's analysis at p < 0.05 were used for statistical comparison. Failure analysis was then recorded for each specimen. The morphological changes in untreated and treated specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Results: The flexural strengths of groups III to IX were significantly higher than that of group II (p < 0.05). The flexural strengths of groups IV to IX showed no significant difference among them (p > 0.05). All specimens in groups V to IX showed 100% cohesive failure, while groups II, III, and IV showed cohesive failure of 10%, 60%, and 60%, respectively. From scanning electron micrographs, the application of methyl formate, methyl acetate, and a mixture of methyl formate-methyl acetate solutions on heat-polymerized acrylic resin resulted in a 3D honeycomb appearance, while specimens treated with methyl methacrylate and Rebase II adhesive developed shallow pits and small crest patterns, respectively. Conclusion: Treating surfaces with methyl formate, methyl acetate, and a mixture of methyl formate-methyl acetate solutions significantly enhanced the flexural strength of heat-polymerized acrylic denture base resin that had been repaired with autopolymerized acrylic resin.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 199
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Effect of Aluminum Oxide on Flexural Strength and Surface Roughness of Conventional Heat-Cure Denture Base Resin
    Ranjan, Madhu
    Chatterjee, Ujjal
    Gupta, Arya
    Pandey, Souvir
    Anand, Rohit
    Keshri, Mritunjay
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (06): : S1003 - S1006
  • [32] Effects of Denture Cleansers on the Flexural Strength of PMMA Denture Base Resin Modified with ZrO2Nanoparticles
    Gad, Mohammed M.
    Abualsaud, Reem
    Fouda, Shaimaa M.
    Rahoma, Ahmed
    Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
    Khan, Soban Q.
    Akhtar, Sultan
    Al-Harbi, Fahad A.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 30 (03): : 235 - 244
  • [33] Evaluation of flexural strength and shear bond strength of repaired microhybrid composite with varied surface treatments
    Jurel, Sunit K.
    Singh, Raghuwar Dayal
    Gupta, Durga Shanker
    Chand, Pooran
    Siddhartha, Ramashanker
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY & OCCLUSION MEDICINE, 2012, 5 (04) : 164 - 168
  • [34] Investigating the biocompatibility, flexural strength, and surface roughness of denture base resin containing copper oxide nanoparticles: An in vitro study
    Ansarifard, Elham
    Zahed, Maryam
    Azarpira, Negar
    Jooyandeh, Saghar
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (09)
  • [35] Effect of Nanodiamond Addition on Flexural Strength, Impact Strength, and Surface Roughness of PMMA Denture Base
    Al-Harbi, Fahad A.
    Abdel-Halim, Mohamed S.
    Gad, Mohammed M.
    Fouda, Shaimaa M.
    Baba, Nadim Z.
    AlRumaih, Hamad S.
    Akhtar, Sultan
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (01): : E417 - E425
  • [36] Effect of Reinforced Self-Cured Acrylic Resin on Flexural Strength
    Apimanchindakul, Chavinee
    Nan, Pheeradej Na
    Aimjirakul, Napapa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 2022
  • [37] Assessing The Outcomes Of Aluminium Oxide On Surface Roughness And Flexural Strength Of Heat Cure Denture Base Resin
    Satyanarayan, Ashok
    Singh, Ravpreet
    Sharma, Ridhi
    Lunkad, Honey
    Mishra, Rahul
    Sandhu, Harminder Singh
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 1116 - 1118
  • [38] An in vitro study of the effect of design of repair surface on the transverse strength of repaired acrylic resin using autopolymerizing resin
    Mahajan, H.
    Chandu, G. S.
    Mishra, S. K.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 17 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [39] Elastic modulus and flexural strength comparisons of high-impact and traditional denture base acrylic resins
    Ajaj-ALKordy, Nour M.
    Alsaadi, Mohannad H.
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2014, 26 (01) : 15 - 18
  • [40] Effect of surface roughness on the hydrophobicity of a denture-base acrylic resin and Candida albicans colonization
    de Foggi, Camila C.
    Machado, Ana L.
    Zamperini, Camila A.
    Fernandes, Darcy
    Wady, Amanda F.
    Vergani, Carlos E.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (02) : 141 - 148