Hypoglycaemia events with iGlarLixi versus premix biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with type 2 diabetes advancing from basal insulin: An analysis of the SoliMix trial

被引:0
|
作者
McCrimmon, Rory J. [1 ]
Home, Philip [2 ]
Cheng, Alice [3 ]
Giorgino, Francesco [4 ]
Fonseca, Vivian [5 ]
Souhami, Elisabeth [6 ]
Alvarez, Agustina [7 ]
Picard, Pascaline [8 ]
Rosenstock, Julio [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Med, Div Syst Med, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Sect Internal Med Endocrinol Androl & Metab Dis, Bari, Italy
[5] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] Sanofi, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[8] IVIDATA Life Sci, Levallois Perret, France
[9] Dallas Diabet Res Ctr Med City, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
BIAsp; 30; fixed-ratio combination; hypoglycaemia; iGlarLixi; SoliMix; type; 2; diabetes; GLARGINE PLUS LIXISENATIDE; FIXED-RATIO COMBINATION; NOCTURNAL HYPOGLYCEMIA; EFFICACY; THERAPY; MECHANISMS; IMPACT; ADHERENCE; METFORMIN; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14825
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims To explore details of the incidence and rates of daytime and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, levels of hypoglycaemia, and relationship to glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), when comparing iGlarLixi versus premixed biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in the SoliMix randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods This exploratory analysis of SoliMix used logistic regression and negative binomial regression analyses to assess between-treatment differences in the incidence and rates of hypoglycaemia by time of day. A negative binomial model was used to derive estimated annualized hypoglycaemia rates as a function of HbA1c. Results iGlarLixi was associated with lower incidence and rates of American Diabetes Association Level 2 (<54 mg/dL [<3.0 mmol/L]) hypoglycaemia during both night and day versus BIAsp 30. Incidence and rates of Level 1 (<70 to >= 54 mg/dL [<3.9 to >= 3.0 mmol/L]) hypoglycaemia were also mostly shown to be reduced with iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30. Severe (Level 3) events were too few for analysis (n = 3). iGlarLixi was associated with lower modelled event rates of Level 2 and Level 1 hypoglycaemia over a wide range of HbA1c levels versus BIAsp 30. Conclusions These results show that the lower HbA1c levels and weight benefit seen with iGlarLixi versus premixed BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes advancing their basal insulin therapy in the SoliMix trial are also accompanied by a lower risk of hypoglycaemia at any time of day and across a broad range of HbA1c levels.
引用
收藏
页码:2391 / 2399
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Switching from biphasic human insulin to biphasic insulin aspart 30 in type 2 diabetes: Results from the ASEAN subgroup of the A1chieve study
    Hussein, Zanariah
    Lim-Abrahan, Mary Anne
    Jain, Anand B.
    Goh, Su Yen
    Soewondo, Pradana
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 100 : S24 - S29
  • [32] Comparison of a soluble co-formulation of insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised trial
    Niskanen, Leo
    Leiter, Lawrence A.
    Franek, Edward
    Weng, Jianping
    Damci, Taner
    Munoz-Torres, Manuel
    Donnet, Jean-Paul
    Endahl, Lars
    Skjoth, Trine Vang
    Vaag, Allan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 167 (02) : 287 - 294
  • [33] The study of once- and twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) with sitagliptin, and twice-daily BIAsp 30 without sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on sitagliptin and metformin-The Sit2Mix trial
    Linjawi, Sultan
    Sothiratnam, Radhakrishna
    Sari, Ramazan
    Andersen, Henning
    Hiort, Line Conradsen
    Rao, Paturi
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2015, 9 (05) : 370 - 376
  • [34] Treatment persistence, adherence and healthcare resource utilisation for iGlarLixi versus basal-bolus insulin or premixed insulin in older adult ethnic minorities with type 2 diabetes: SoliEthnicity study
    Umpierrez, Guillermo
    Gill, Jasvinder
    Hood, David
    Li, Xuan
    Nunez, Ana
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024, : 795 - 805
  • [35] Multiple mealtime administration of biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus traditional basal-bolus human insulin treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes
    Chen, J. -W.
    Lauritzen, T.
    Bojesen, A.
    Christiansen, J. S.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2006, 8 (06) : 682 - 689
  • [36] Insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination (iGlarLixi) compared with premix or addition of meal-time insulin to basal insulin in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Home, Philip
    Blonde, Lawrence
    Kalra, Sanjay
    Ji, Linong
    Guyot, Patricia
    Brulle-Wohlhueter, Claire
    Murray, Erin
    Shah, Roshan
    Sayre, Toby
    Shaunik, Alka
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 (11) : 2179 - 2188
  • [37] Starting patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy using once-daily injections of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30, biphasic human insulin 70/30, or NPH insulin in combination with metformin
    Kilo, C
    Mezitis, N
    Jain, R
    Mersey, J
    McGill, J
    Raskin, P
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2003, 17 (06) : 307 - 313
  • [38] A randomized trial of insulin aspart with intensified basal NPH insulin supplementation in people with Type 1 diabetes
    DeVries, JH
    Lindholm, A
    Jacobsen, JL
    Heine, RJ
    Home, PD
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2003, 20 (04) : 312 - 318
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 vs. human premix insulin in type 2 diabetes from the payer's perspective in Bulgaria
    Valov, V. (vasv@novonordisk.com), 1600, Diagnosis Press Limited. (26): : 2937 - 2944
  • [40] Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in type 2 diabetes
    Valentine, William J.
    Pollock, Richard F.
    Plun-Favreau, Juliette
    White, Jeremy
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (06) : 1399 - 1412