Hypoglycaemia events with iGlarLixi versus premix biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with type 2 diabetes advancing from basal insulin: An analysis of the SoliMix trial

被引:0
|
作者
McCrimmon, Rory J. [1 ]
Home, Philip [2 ]
Cheng, Alice [3 ]
Giorgino, Francesco [4 ]
Fonseca, Vivian [5 ]
Souhami, Elisabeth [6 ]
Alvarez, Agustina [7 ]
Picard, Pascaline [8 ]
Rosenstock, Julio [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Med, Div Syst Med, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Sect Internal Med Endocrinol Androl & Metab Dis, Bari, Italy
[5] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] Sanofi, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[8] IVIDATA Life Sci, Levallois Perret, France
[9] Dallas Diabet Res Ctr Med City, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
BIAsp; 30; fixed-ratio combination; hypoglycaemia; iGlarLixi; SoliMix; type; 2; diabetes; GLARGINE PLUS LIXISENATIDE; FIXED-RATIO COMBINATION; NOCTURNAL HYPOGLYCEMIA; EFFICACY; THERAPY; MECHANISMS; IMPACT; ADHERENCE; METFORMIN; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14825
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims To explore details of the incidence and rates of daytime and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, levels of hypoglycaemia, and relationship to glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), when comparing iGlarLixi versus premixed biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in the SoliMix randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods This exploratory analysis of SoliMix used logistic regression and negative binomial regression analyses to assess between-treatment differences in the incidence and rates of hypoglycaemia by time of day. A negative binomial model was used to derive estimated annualized hypoglycaemia rates as a function of HbA1c. Results iGlarLixi was associated with lower incidence and rates of American Diabetes Association Level 2 (<54 mg/dL [<3.0 mmol/L]) hypoglycaemia during both night and day versus BIAsp 30. Incidence and rates of Level 1 (<70 to >= 54 mg/dL [<3.9 to >= 3.0 mmol/L]) hypoglycaemia were also mostly shown to be reduced with iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30. Severe (Level 3) events were too few for analysis (n = 3). iGlarLixi was associated with lower modelled event rates of Level 2 and Level 1 hypoglycaemia over a wide range of HbA1c levels versus BIAsp 30. Conclusions These results show that the lower HbA1c levels and weight benefit seen with iGlarLixi versus premixed BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes advancing their basal insulin therapy in the SoliMix trial are also accompanied by a lower risk of hypoglycaemia at any time of day and across a broad range of HbA1c levels.
引用
收藏
页码:2391 / 2399
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30/50/70 from biphasic human insulin 30/50 in patients with type 2 diabetes in normal clinical practice: observational study results
    Nobels, Frank
    D'Hooge, Dirk
    Crenier, Laurent
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2012, 28 (06) : 1017 - 1026
  • [22] Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Niu, Yan-Li
    Zhang, Ye
    Song, Zhi-Yong
    Zhao, Chuan-Zhi
    Luo, Yun
    Wang, Yan
    Yuan, Jing
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 53 (02) : 313 - 322
  • [23] Biphasic insulin aspart 30: Better glycemic control than with premixed human insulin 30 in obese patients with Type 2 diabetes
    Velojic-Golubovic, M.
    Mikic, D.
    Pesic, M.
    Dimic, D.
    Radenkovic, S.
    Antic, S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION, 2009, 32 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [24] Effectiveness and safety of iGlarLixi in people with type 2 diabetes not at target on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic therapy in a prospective observational trial
    Seufert, Jochen
    Wiesner, Tobias
    Pegelow, Katrin
    Kenzler, Julia
    Pfohl, Martin
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2025, 27 (03) : 1526 - 1535
  • [25] Biphasic insulin aspart 30 for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus
    Velasquez-Mieyer, Pedro A.
    Neira, Claudia P.
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2008, 9 (13) : 2377 - 2382
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 in type 2 diabetes patients of different race or ethnicity (INITIATEplus trial)
    Trippe, Bruce S.
    Shepherd, Mark D.
    Coulter, Franklin C.
    Bhargava, Anuj
    Brett, Jason
    Chu, Pei-Ling
    Oyer, David S.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2012, 28 (07) : 1203 - 1211
  • [27] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF BIPHASIC INSULIN ASPART 30 VS. HUMAN PREMIX INSULIN IN TYPE 2 DIABETES FROM THE PAYER'S PERSPECTIVE IN BULGARIA
    Valov, Vasil
    Palmer, James
    Czech, Marcin
    Savova, Alexandra
    Petrova, Guenka
    BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2012, 26 (02) : 2937 - 2944
  • [28] Treating Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Uncontrolled on Basal Insulin in the Czech Republic: Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira Versus iGlarLixi
    Pohlmann, Johannes
    Russel-Szymczyk, Monika
    Holik, Pavel
    Rychna, Karel
    Hunt, Barnaby
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2019, 10 (02) : 493 - 508
  • [29] Biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment for people with type 2 diabetes: a budget impact analysis based in Thailand
    Deerochanawong, Chaicharn
    Kosachunhanun, Natapong
    Chotikanokrat, Pitthaporn
    Permsuwan, Unchalee
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2018, 34 (02) : 369 - 375
  • [30] Lower rates of hypoglycemia during maintenance treatment with insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30: a combined analysis of two Phase 3a studies in type 2 diabetes
    Christiansen, Jens Sandahl
    Niskanen, Leo
    Rasmussen, Soren
    Johansen, Thue
    Fulcher, Greg
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2016, 8 (05) : 720 - 728