Emergency core cooling mode of the European pressurized water reactor: The evolution from combined injection to cold-leg injection

被引:1
作者
Curca-Tivig, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Siemens AG, Power Generat Grp, KWU, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
European PWR; emergency core cooling; loss-of-coolant accident;
D O I
10.13182/NT98-A2909
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The European Pressurized Water Reactor's (EPR's) safety injection system (SIS) comprises four trains, each of them consisting of a medium head safety injection, an accumulator and a low head safety injection (LHSI). Injection mode is into the cold legs of the main coolant line for the short term. This emergency core cooling (ECC) mode is quite different from the typical German concept with combined injection, i.e., safety injection into both the cold and the hot legs of the main coolant line at least for accumulator and LHSI. Therefore, the German Safety Authority requested justification for giving up the ECC-mode used in German pressurized water reactors, the so-called "combined injection." Furthermore, the Reaktor-sicherheitskommission requested a comparison between cold-leg injection and combined injection in terms of ECC efficiency over all relevant accident sequences. The evolution from combined injection to cold-leg injection is described and results of comparative analysis are summarized It is demonstrated that EPR's SIS is a well-balanced system, which ensures high ECC efficiency and limits loads to containment over the whole accident spectrum, For the entire loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) spectrum, ECC efficiency of EPR's SIS is practicably equivalent to ECC efficiency of a SIS of the KONVOI type with combined injection. The smaller the break, the more insignificant are differences. The ECC mode has a negligible impact on containment pressure and temperature evolution during a LOCA. Neither with combined injection nor with cold-leg injection is a containment spray system needed.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 81
页数:17
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1989, NUREGCR5249 US NUCL
  • [2] BOUTEILLE F, 1997, P NUCL ENG INT OCT
  • [3] BRAND B, 1985, P 13 WAT REACT SAF R
  • [4] Carlson K. E., 1990, NUREGCR5535 US NUCL
  • [5] CURCATIVIG F, 1994, P INT C NEW TRENDS N
  • [6] CURCATIVIG F, 1995, P PROGR DES R D TEST
  • [7] CURCATIVIG F, 1997, P JAHR KERNT AACH GE
  • [8] FISCHER U, 1995, P SFEN KTG C EPR PRO
  • [9] *GES REAKT MBH, 1992, GRS100 GES REAKT MBH
  • [10] *GES REAKT MBH, 1993, GRS101 GES REAKT MBH