Game analysis of environmental cost allocation in green supply chain under fairness preference

被引:22
|
作者
Qin, Qin [1 ]
Jiang, Maoting [1 ]
Xie, Jianmin [1 ]
He, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Mianyang 6210100, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Green supply chain; Fairness preference; Stackelberg game; Cost allocation; COORDINATION; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.020
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Cost allocation is a way to promote enterprises to actively implement green supply chain management, and the behavior preference of decision makers will affect the process. This paper considers the situation that manufacturer has fairness preference and retailer is fair neutral, and constructs a secondary supply chain composed of a single manufacturer and a single retailer. We explore two models of cost allocation-based on the Stackelberg model, the impact of retailers' nonparticipation/participation in cost allocation on supply chain is discussed, while through the Nash bargaining model, the range and optimal solution of the environmental cost allocation ratio are determined. And we show how product wholesale prices, retail prices, green innovation investment, and the optimal ratio of environmental cost allocation are influenced by fairness preference. The results show that retailers' participation in environmental cost allocation will increase the level of product greenness and make the entire supply chain Pareto optimal. The strong fairness preference of manufacturer will weaken the positive effect of retailers participating in cost allocation on the supply chain. Therefore, the government and enterprises should adopt incentive measures to actively promote the collaboration between channel partners in order to share the environmental cost, and manufacturers should pay less attention to fairness. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:6014 / 6022
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INVESTIGATING A GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN WITH PRODUCT RECYCLING UNDER RETAILER'S FAIRNESS BEHAVIOR
    Mondal, Chirantan
    Giri, Bibhas C.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2021, : 3641 - 3677
  • [22] Green supply chain management under uncertainty: a review and content analysis
    Chen, Nan
    Cai, Jianfeng
    Ma, Yanran
    Han, Wenting
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04): : 349 - 365
  • [23] Sustainable Cooperation in the Green Supply Chain under Financial Constraints
    Xing, Guangyuan
    Xia, Bing
    Guo, Jue
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)
  • [24] Supply chain decisions under asymmetric information with cost and fairness concern
    Qin, Yanhong
    Shao, Yunfei
    ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 13 (10) : 1347 - 1366
  • [25] Game-theoretical analysis for supply chain with consumer preference to low carbon
    Du, Shaofu
    Zhu, Jiaang
    Jiao, Huifang
    Ye, Wuyi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (12) : 3753 - 3768
  • [26] An integrated contract for coordinating a three-stage green forward and reverse supply chain under fairness concerns
    Toktas-Palut, Peral
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [27] An Improved Revenue Distribution Model for Logistics Service Supply Chain Considering Fairness Preference
    Lu, Fuqiang
    Wang, Liying
    Bi, Hualing
    Du, Zichao
    Wang, Suxin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [28] Evolutionary Game Analysis of Enterprise Green Innovation and Green Financing in Platform Supply Chain
    Liu, Ling
    Peng, Qiaoyu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [29] Green subsidy Strategies and fairness concern in a Capital-Constrained supply chain
    Wu, Huamin
    Weng, Jiaxiang
    Li, Guo
    Zheng, Hong
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2024, 192
  • [30] Managing a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness and Channel Preference
    Du, Xianjin
    Zhao, Weijie
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021