Combined use of positron emission tomography and volume doubling time in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scanning

被引:75
|
作者
Ashraf, H. [1 ]
Dirksen, A. [2 ,3 ]
Loft, A. [4 ]
Bertelsen, A. K. [4 ]
Bach, K. S. [1 ]
Hansen, H. [1 ]
Pedersen, J. H. [5 ]
Mortensen, J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Med, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Thorac Surg RT, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
SMALL PULMONARY NODULES; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; GROWTH-RATE; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; SOLITARY; NELSON; DESIGN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/thx.2010.136747
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In lung cancer screening the ability to distinguish malignant from benign nodules is a key issue. This study evaluates the ability of positron emission tomography (PET) and volume doubling time (VDT) to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules. Methods From the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial, participants with indeterminate nodules who were referred for a 3-month rescan were investigated. Resected nodules and indolent nodules (ie, stable for at least 2 years) were included. Between the initial scan and the 3-month rescan, participants were referred for PET. Uptake on PET was categorised as most likely benign to malignant (grades I-IV). VDT was calculated from volume measurements on repeated CT scans using semiautomated pulmonary nodule evaluation software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PET and VDT. Results A total of 54 nodules were included. The prevalence of lung cancer was 37%. In the multivariate model both PET (OR 2.63, p < 0.01) and VDT (OR 2.69, p < 0.01) were associated with lung cancer. The sensitivities and specificities of both PET and VDT were 71% and 91%, respectively. Cut-off points for malignancy were PET > II and VDT < 1 year, respectively. Combining PET and VDT resulted in a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 82%; ROC cut-off point was either PET or VDT indicating malignancy. Conclusion PET and VDT predict lung cancer independently of each other. The use of both PET and VDT in combination is recommended when screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 319
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lung cancer screening with low-dose computerised tomography. Thoughts on its use in Spain
    Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
    Provencio-Pulla, Mariano
    Casan Clara, Pere
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2016, 147 (08): : 366 - 370
  • [42] Overdiagnosis in Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography Response
    Mascalchi, Mario
    Lopes-Pegna, Andrea
    Paci, Eugenio
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 (11) : E102 - E103
  • [43] Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical CT: results from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST)
    Kramer, Barnett S.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Aberle, Denise R.
    Prorok, Philip C.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2011, 18 (03) : 109 - 111
  • [44] Estimating Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer A Cohort Study
    Veronesi, Giulia
    Maisonneuve, Patrick
    Bellomi, Massimo
    Rampinelli, Cristiano
    Durli, Iara
    Bertolotti, Raffaella
    Spaggiari, Lorenzo
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (11) : 776 - +
  • [45] Action plan for an international imaging framework for implementation of global low-dose CT screening for lung cancer
    Lancaster, Harriet L.
    Walstra, Anna N. H.
    Myers, Kyle
    Avila, Ricardo S.
    Gratama, Jan Willem C.
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    Fain, Sean B.
    Clunie, David A.
    Kazerooni, Ella A.
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Reeves, Anthony P.
    Vogel-Claussen, Jens
    de Koning, Harry
    Yip, Rowena
    Seijo, Luis M.
    Field, John K.
    Mulshine, James L.
    Silva, Mario
    Yankelevitz, David F.
    Henschke, Claudia I.
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2025, 220
  • [46] Optimisation of volume-doubling time cutoff for fast-growing lung nodules in CT lung cancer screening reduces false-positive referrals
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Xie, Xueqian
    van Ooijen, Peter M. A.
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    de Jong, Pim A.
    Groen, Harry J. M.
    Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (07) : 1836 - 1845
  • [47] Screening for lung cancer using low-dose spiral CT: 10 years later, state of the art
    Zompatori, M.
    Mascalchi, M.
    Ciccarese, F.
    Sverzellati, N.
    Pastorino, U.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (01): : 51 - 61
  • [48] Screening for lung cancer using low-dose spiral CT: 10 years later, state of the art
    Zompatori, M.
    Mascalchi, M.
    Ciccarese, F.
    Sverzellati, N.
    Pastorino, U.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (01): : 51 - 61
  • [49] Systematic review of baseline low-dose CT lung cancer screening
    Yau, Gary
    Lock, Michael
    Rodrigues, George
    LUNG CANCER, 2007, 58 (02) : 161 - 170
  • [50] Volume doubling time of lung cancers detected in a chest radiograph mass screening program: Comparison with CT screening
    Kanashiki, Maki
    Tomizawa, Takuji
    Yamaguchi, Iwao
    Kurishima, Koichi
    Hizawa, Nobuyuki
    Ishikawa, Hiroichi
    Kagohashi, Katsunori
    Satoh, Hiroaki
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 4 (03) : 513 - 516