Combined use of positron emission tomography and volume doubling time in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scanning

被引:75
|
作者
Ashraf, H. [1 ]
Dirksen, A. [2 ,3 ]
Loft, A. [4 ]
Bertelsen, A. K. [4 ]
Bach, K. S. [1 ]
Hansen, H. [1 ]
Pedersen, J. H. [5 ]
Mortensen, J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Med, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Thorac Surg RT, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
SMALL PULMONARY NODULES; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; GROWTH-RATE; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; SOLITARY; NELSON; DESIGN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/thx.2010.136747
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In lung cancer screening the ability to distinguish malignant from benign nodules is a key issue. This study evaluates the ability of positron emission tomography (PET) and volume doubling time (VDT) to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules. Methods From the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial, participants with indeterminate nodules who were referred for a 3-month rescan were investigated. Resected nodules and indolent nodules (ie, stable for at least 2 years) were included. Between the initial scan and the 3-month rescan, participants were referred for PET. Uptake on PET was categorised as most likely benign to malignant (grades I-IV). VDT was calculated from volume measurements on repeated CT scans using semiautomated pulmonary nodule evaluation software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PET and VDT. Results A total of 54 nodules were included. The prevalence of lung cancer was 37%. In the multivariate model both PET (OR 2.63, p < 0.01) and VDT (OR 2.69, p < 0.01) were associated with lung cancer. The sensitivities and specificities of both PET and VDT were 71% and 91%, respectively. Cut-off points for malignancy were PET > II and VDT < 1 year, respectively. Combining PET and VDT resulted in a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 82%; ROC cut-off point was either PET or VDT indicating malignancy. Conclusion PET and VDT predict lung cancer independently of each other. The use of both PET and VDT in combination is recommended when screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 319
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does lung cancer screening with low-dose computerized tomography improve survival?
    Manuel, Lucy
    Fong, Laura S.
    Ly, Thompson
    Meredith, Graham
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 33 (05) : 741 - 745
  • [32] Reviewing risks and benefits of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer
    Chopra, Ishveen
    Chopra, Avijeet
    Bias, Thomas K.
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2016, 128 (02) : 254 - 261
  • [33] Early detection of lung cancer: Low-dose computed tomography screening in China
    Zhao, Shi-Jun
    Wu, Ning
    THORACIC CANCER, 2015, 6 (04) : 385 - 389
  • [34] Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography After the National Lung Screening Trial. The Debate is Still Open
    Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
    Perez Rios, Monica
    Fernandez-Villar, Alberto
    ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2013, 49 (04): : 158 - 165
  • [35] Model concept of the health economic evaluation of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in Hungary
    Voko Zoltan
    Barra Magdolna
    Molnar Anett
    Kerpel-Fronius Anna
    Bajzik Gabor
    Horvath Ildiko
    Moizs Mariann
    Nagy Balazs
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2017, 158 (25) : 963 - 975
  • [36] Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: a world-wide view
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (03) : 234 - 242
  • [37] Low-Dose CT Scan for Lung Cancer Screening: Clinical and Coding Considerations
    Shieh, Yiwey
    Bohnenkamp, Martin
    CHEST, 2017, 152 (01) : 204 - 209
  • [38] A national survey of lung cancer specialists' views on low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in Korea
    Shin, Dong Wook
    Chun, Sohyun
    Kim, Young Il
    Kim, Seung Joon
    Kim, Jung Soo
    Chong, SeMin
    Park, Young Sik
    Song, Sang-Yun
    Lee, Jin Han
    Ahn, Hee Kyung
    Kim, Eun Young
    Yang, Sei Hoon
    Lee, Myoung Kyu
    Cho, Deog Gon
    Jang, Tae Won
    Son, Ji Woong
    Ryu, Jeong-Seon
    Cho, Moon-June
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [39] Dose exposure in the ITALUNG trial of lung cancer screening with low-dose CT
    Mascalchi, M.
    Mazzoni, L. N.
    Falchini, M.
    Belli, G.
    Picozzi, G.
    Merlini, V.
    Vella, A.
    Diciotti, S.
    Falaschi, F.
    Pegna, A. Lopes
    Paci, E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1016) : 1134 - 1139
  • [40] Reflections on the Implementation of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening in Individuals at High Risk of Lung Cancer in Spain
    Garrido, Pilar
    Sanchez, Marcelo
    Belda Sanchis, Jose
    Moreno Mata, Nicolas
    Artal, Angel
    Gayete, Angel
    Matilla Gonzalez, Jose Maria
    Galbis Caravajal, Jose Marcelo
    Isla, Dolores
    Paz-Ares, Luis
    Seijo, Luis M.
    ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2017, 53 (10): : 568 - 573