Combined use of positron emission tomography and volume doubling time in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scanning

被引:75
|
作者
Ashraf, H. [1 ]
Dirksen, A. [2 ,3 ]
Loft, A. [4 ]
Bertelsen, A. K. [4 ]
Bach, K. S. [1 ]
Hansen, H. [1 ]
Pedersen, J. H. [5 ]
Mortensen, J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Med, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Thorac Surg RT, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
SMALL PULMONARY NODULES; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; GROWTH-RATE; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; SOLITARY; NELSON; DESIGN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/thx.2010.136747
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In lung cancer screening the ability to distinguish malignant from benign nodules is a key issue. This study evaluates the ability of positron emission tomography (PET) and volume doubling time (VDT) to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules. Methods From the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial, participants with indeterminate nodules who were referred for a 3-month rescan were investigated. Resected nodules and indolent nodules (ie, stable for at least 2 years) were included. Between the initial scan and the 3-month rescan, participants were referred for PET. Uptake on PET was categorised as most likely benign to malignant (grades I-IV). VDT was calculated from volume measurements on repeated CT scans using semiautomated pulmonary nodule evaluation software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PET and VDT. Results A total of 54 nodules were included. The prevalence of lung cancer was 37%. In the multivariate model both PET (OR 2.63, p < 0.01) and VDT (OR 2.69, p < 0.01) were associated with lung cancer. The sensitivities and specificities of both PET and VDT were 71% and 91%, respectively. Cut-off points for malignancy were PET > II and VDT < 1 year, respectively. Combining PET and VDT resulted in a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 82%; ROC cut-off point was either PET or VDT indicating malignancy. Conclusion PET and VDT predict lung cancer independently of each other. The use of both PET and VDT in combination is recommended when screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 319
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low-dose computed tomography screening reduces lung cancer mortality
    Ostrowski, Marcin
    Marjanski, Tomasz
    Rzyman, Witold
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (02): : 230 - 236
  • [22] Low-dose CT for lung cancer screening Reply
    Field, John K.
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    Devaraj, Anand
    Heussel, Claus P.
    Baldwin, David R.
    Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (03) : E135 - E136
  • [23] Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: a Meta-Analysis
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Atallah, Rami P.
    Struble, Roger D.
    Badgett, Robert G.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (10) : 3015 - 3025
  • [25] The future of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography
    Jaklitsch, Michael T.
    Jacobson, Francine L.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 160 (01) : 289 - 294
  • [26] Lung-Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Gould, Michael K.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (19) : 1813 - 1820
  • [27] The role of low-dose computed tomography in lung cancer screening
    Agh Tamas
    Szilberhorn Laszlo
    Csanadi Marcell
    Szeles Gyorgy
    Voko Zoltan
    Adam Gabor
    Kallai Arpad
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2022, 163 (37) : 1464 - 1471
  • [28] Appropriate screening intervals in low-dose CT lung cancer screening
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (03) : 281 - 287
  • [29] Cons: lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography
    Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
    Fernandez-Villar, Alberto
    Provencio-Pulla, Mariano
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2016, 30 (05) : 383 - 385
  • [30] Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: results of the first screening round
    Horeweg, Nanda
    Nackaerts, Kristiaan
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    de Koning, Harry J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (05) : 433 - 436