Combined use of positron emission tomography and volume doubling time in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scanning

被引:75
|
作者
Ashraf, H. [1 ]
Dirksen, A. [2 ,3 ]
Loft, A. [4 ]
Bertelsen, A. K. [4 ]
Bach, K. S. [1 ]
Hansen, H. [1 ]
Pedersen, J. H. [5 ]
Mortensen, J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Med, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Thorac Surg RT, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
SMALL PULMONARY NODULES; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; GROWTH-RATE; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; SOLITARY; NELSON; DESIGN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/thx.2010.136747
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In lung cancer screening the ability to distinguish malignant from benign nodules is a key issue. This study evaluates the ability of positron emission tomography (PET) and volume doubling time (VDT) to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules. Methods From the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial, participants with indeterminate nodules who were referred for a 3-month rescan were investigated. Resected nodules and indolent nodules (ie, stable for at least 2 years) were included. Between the initial scan and the 3-month rescan, participants were referred for PET. Uptake on PET was categorised as most likely benign to malignant (grades I-IV). VDT was calculated from volume measurements on repeated CT scans using semiautomated pulmonary nodule evaluation software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PET and VDT. Results A total of 54 nodules were included. The prevalence of lung cancer was 37%. In the multivariate model both PET (OR 2.63, p < 0.01) and VDT (OR 2.69, p < 0.01) were associated with lung cancer. The sensitivities and specificities of both PET and VDT were 71% and 91%, respectively. Cut-off points for malignancy were PET > II and VDT < 1 year, respectively. Combining PET and VDT resulted in a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 82%; ROC cut-off point was either PET or VDT indicating malignancy. Conclusion PET and VDT predict lung cancer independently of each other. The use of both PET and VDT in combination is recommended when screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 319
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Small pulmonary nodules in baseline and incidence screening rounds of low-dose CT lung cancer screening
    Walter, Joan E.
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (01) : 42 - 51
  • [2] Lung Cancer Screening: Use of Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Martinez Perez, Encarnacion
    de Aguiar Quevedo, Karol
    Arraras Martinez, Miguel
    Cruz Mojarrieta, Julia
    Fernandez de Moya, Estanislao Arana
    Barrios Benito, Maria
    Hinarejos Parga, Susana
    Cervera Deval, Jose
    Penalver Cuesta, Juan Carlos
    ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2019, 55 (10): : 526 - 531
  • [3] Low-dose CT for lung cancer screening: opportunities and challenges
    Shen, Hongbing
    FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE, 2018, 12 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [4] Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Chiles, Caroline
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 52 (01) : 27 - +
  • [5] Bronchiectasis in Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer
    Cai, Qiang
    Triphuridet, Natthaya
    Zhu, Yeqing
    You, Nan
    Yip, Rowena
    Yankelevitz, David F.
    Henschke, Claudia, I
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 304 (02) : 437 - 447
  • [6] The evidence for low-dose CT screening of lung cancer
    Ruchalski, Kathleen
    Gutierrez, Antonio
    Genshaft, Scott
    Abtin, Fereidoun
    Suh, Robert
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (02) : 288 - 295
  • [7] Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: Baseline Screening Results in Shanghai
    Fan, Li
    Wang, Yun
    Zhou, Ying
    Li, Qiong
    Yang, Wenjie
    Wang, Shengping
    Shan, Fei
    Zhang, Xingwei
    Shi, Jingyun
    Chen, Wufei
    Liu, Shi-Yuan
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (10) : 1283 - 1291
  • [8] Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT
    Diederich, S
    Wormanns, D
    Heindel, W
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 45 (01) : 2 - 7
  • [9] Diagnostic Performance of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer over Five Years
    Veronesi, Giulia
    Maisonneuve, Patrick
    Spaggiari, Lorenzo
    Rampinelli, Cristiano
    Pardolesi, Alessandro
    Bertolotti, Raffaella
    Filippi, Niccolo
    Bellomi, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 (07) : 935 - 939
  • [10] Hesitancy around low-dose CT screening for lung cancer
    Dickson, J. L.
    Horst, C.
    Nair, A.
    Tisi, S.
    Prendecki, R.
    Janes, S. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (01) : 34 - 41