Use of machine learning to achieve keratoconus detection skills of a corneal expert

被引:9
|
作者
Cohen, Eyal [1 ,2 ]
Bank, Dor [3 ]
Sorkin, Nir [1 ,2 ]
Giryes, Raja [3 ]
Varssano, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, 6 Weizmann St, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ Sackler, Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Random forest; Keratoconus; Detection; Galilei; Dual Scheimpflug; Placido; TOPOGRAPHY; GLAUCOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-022-02404-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To construct an automatic machine-learning derived algorithm discriminating between normal corneas and suspect irregular or keratoconic corneas. Methods A total of 8526 corneal tomography images of 4904 eyes obtained between November 2010 and July 2017 using a combined Scheimpflug/Placido tomographer were retrospectively evaluated. Each image was evaluated for acquisition quality and was labeled as normal, suspect irregular or keratoconic by a cornea specialist. Two algorithms were built. The first was based on 94 instrument-derived output parameters, and the second integrated keratoconus prediction indices of the device with the 94 instrument-derived output parameters. Both models were compared with the tomographer's keratoconus detection algorithms. Out of the 8526 images evaluated, 7104 images of 3787 eyes had sufficient acquisition quality. Of those, 5904 examinations were randomly chosen for construction of the models using the random forest algorithm. The models were then validated using the remaining 1200 examinations. Results Both RF algorithms had a larger AUC compared with any of the tomographer's KC detection algorithms (p < 10(-9)). The first constructed model had 90.2% accuracy, sensitivity of 94.2%, and specificity of 89.6% (Youden 0.838). Calculated AUC was 0.964. The second model had 91.5% accuracy, sensitivity of 94.7%, and specificity of 89.8% (Youden 0.846). Calculated AUC was 0.969. Conclusion Using the RF machine-learning algorithm, accuracy of discrimination between normal, suspect irregular and keratoconic corneas approximates that of an experienced corneal expert. Applying machine learning to corneal tomography can facilitate keratoconus screening in large populations as well as off-site screening of refractive surgery candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:3837 / 3847
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deep Transfer Learning for Improved Detection of Keratoconus using Corneal Topographic Maps
    Ali H. Al-Timemy
    Nebras H. Ghaeb
    Zahraa M. Mosa
    Javier Escudero
    Cognitive Computation, 2022, 14 : 1627 - 1642
  • [22] Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus
    Cao, Ke
    Verspoor, Karin
    Sahebjada, Srujana
    Baird, Paul N.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02):
  • [23] Robust keratoconus detection with Bayesian network classifier for Placido- based corneal indices
    Castro-Luna, Gracia M.
    Martinez-Finkelshtein, Andrei
    Ramos-Lopez, Dario
    CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2020, 43 (04) : 366 - 372
  • [24] Fourier analysis of corneal Scheimpflug imaging: clinical use in keratoconus
    Akincioglu, Dorukcan
    Ozge, Gokhan
    Ayyildiz, Onder
    Gokce, Gokcen
    Karaca, Umut
    Mutlu, Fatih Mehmet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 14 (12) : 1963 - 1969
  • [25] Keratoconus detection by corneal asymmetry analysis with Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography
    David Galletti, Jonatan
    Ruisenor Vazquez, Pablo Raul
    Ximena Minguez, Natalia
    Delrivo, Marianella
    Fuentes Bonthoux, Fernando
    Pfortner, Tomas
    Gaston Galletti, Jeremias
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [26] Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning
    Liu, Yu
    Shen, Dan
    Wang, Hao-yu
    Qi, Meng-ying
    Zeng, Qing-yan
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [27] Keratoconus detection and classification from parameters of the Corvis®ST A study based on algorithms of machine learning
    Langenbucher, Achim
    Haefner, Larissa
    Eppig, Timo
    Seitz, Berthold
    Szentmary, Nora
    Flockerzi, Elias
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2021, 118 (07): : 697 - 706
  • [28] Comparison of Machine Learning Methods to Automatically Classify Keratoconus
    Hidalgo, Irene Ruiz
    Rodriguez Perez, Pablo
    Rozema, Jos J.
    Tassignon, Marie-Jose B. R.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [29] Machine Learning Techniques in Keratoconus Classification: A Systematic Review
    Mustapha, Aatila
    Mohamed, Lachgar
    Hamid, Hrimech
    Ali, Kartit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 14 (05) : 648 - 657
  • [30] Endpoint Detection and Response: Why Use Machine Learning?
    Sjarif, Nilam Nur Amir
    Chuprat, Suriayati
    Mahrin, Mohd Naz'ri
    Ahmad, Noor Azurati
    Ariffin, Aswami
    Senan, Firham M.
    Zamani, Nazri Ahmad
    Saupi, Afifah
    2019 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY CONVERGENCE (ICTC): ICT CONVERGENCE LEADING THE AUTONOMOUS FUTURE, 2019, : 283 - 288