Use of machine learning to achieve keratoconus detection skills of a corneal expert

被引:9
|
作者
Cohen, Eyal [1 ,2 ]
Bank, Dor [3 ]
Sorkin, Nir [1 ,2 ]
Giryes, Raja [3 ]
Varssano, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, 6 Weizmann St, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ Sackler, Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Random forest; Keratoconus; Detection; Galilei; Dual Scheimpflug; Placido; TOPOGRAPHY; GLAUCOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-022-02404-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To construct an automatic machine-learning derived algorithm discriminating between normal corneas and suspect irregular or keratoconic corneas. Methods A total of 8526 corneal tomography images of 4904 eyes obtained between November 2010 and July 2017 using a combined Scheimpflug/Placido tomographer were retrospectively evaluated. Each image was evaluated for acquisition quality and was labeled as normal, suspect irregular or keratoconic by a cornea specialist. Two algorithms were built. The first was based on 94 instrument-derived output parameters, and the second integrated keratoconus prediction indices of the device with the 94 instrument-derived output parameters. Both models were compared with the tomographer's keratoconus detection algorithms. Out of the 8526 images evaluated, 7104 images of 3787 eyes had sufficient acquisition quality. Of those, 5904 examinations were randomly chosen for construction of the models using the random forest algorithm. The models were then validated using the remaining 1200 examinations. Results Both RF algorithms had a larger AUC compared with any of the tomographer's KC detection algorithms (p < 10(-9)). The first constructed model had 90.2% accuracy, sensitivity of 94.2%, and specificity of 89.6% (Youden 0.838). Calculated AUC was 0.964. The second model had 91.5% accuracy, sensitivity of 94.7%, and specificity of 89.8% (Youden 0.846). Calculated AUC was 0.969. Conclusion Using the RF machine-learning algorithm, accuracy of discrimination between normal, suspect irregular and keratoconic corneas approximates that of an experienced corneal expert. Applying machine learning to corneal tomography can facilitate keratoconus screening in large populations as well as off-site screening of refractive surgery candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:3837 / 3847
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of machine learning to achieve keratoconus detection skills of a corneal expert
    Eyal Cohen
    Dor Bank
    Nir Sorkin
    Raja Giryes
    David Varssano
    International Ophthalmology, 2022, 42 : 3837 - 3847
  • [2] A Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Keratoconus Detection and Refractive Surgery Screening
    Lin, Shawn R.
    Ladas, John G.
    Bahadur, Gavin G.
    Al-Hashimi, Saba
    Pineda, Roberto
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 34 (04) : 317 - 326
  • [3] Comparison of machine learning–based algorithms using corneal asymmetry vs. single-metric parameters for keratoconus detection
    Gaurav Prakash
    Chandrashan Perera
    Vishal Jhanji
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2023, 261 : 2335 - 2342
  • [4] Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Imaging Data Using Machine Learning
    Lavric, Alexandru
    Popa, Valentin
    Takahashi, Hidenori
    Yousefi, Siamak
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 149113 - 149121
  • [5] Comparison of machine learning-based algorithms using corneal asymmetry vs. single-metric parameters for keratoconus detection
    Prakash, Gaurav
    Perera, Chandrashan
    Jhanji, Vishal
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 261 (08) : 2335 - 2342
  • [6] Keratoconus Severity Detection From Elevation, Topography and Pachymetry Raw Data Using a Machine Learning Approach
    Lavric, Alexandru
    Anchidin, Liliana
    Popa, Valentin
    Al-Timemy, Ali H.
    Alyasseri, Zaid
    Takahashi, Hidenori
    Yousefi, Siamak
    Hazarbassanov, Rossen M.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 84344 - 84355
  • [7] Machine learning methods to identify risk factors for corneal graft rejection in keratoconus
    Feizi, Sepehr
    Javadi, Mohammad Ali
    Bayat, Kia
    Arzaghi, Mohammadreza
    Rahdar, Amir
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Javad
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [8] Accuracy of Machine Learning Assisted Detection of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cao, Ke
    Verspoor, Karin
    Sahebjada, Srujana
    Baird, Paul N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [9] SmartKC: Smartphone-based Corneal Topographer for Keratoconus Detection
    Gairola, Siddhartha
    Bohra, Murtuza
    Shaheer, Nadeem
    Jayaprakash, Navya
    Joshi, Pallavi
    Balasubramaniam, Anand
    Murali, Kaushik
    Kwatra, Nipun
    Jain, Mohit
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON INTERACTIVE MOBILE WEARABLE AND UBIQUITOUS TECHNOLOGIES-IMWUT, 2021, 5 (04):
  • [10] KeratoEL: Detection of keratoconus using corneal parameters with ensemble learning
    Paul, Prodeep Kumar
    Hossan, Arif
    Ullah, Shah Muhammad A.
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2024, 7 (07)