Work-Family Practices and Complexity of Their Usage: A Discourse Analysis Towards Socially Responsible Human Resource Management

被引:22
作者
Heikkinen, Suvi [1 ]
Lamsa, Anna-Maija [1 ]
Niemisto, Charlotta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Sch Business & Econ, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[2] HANKEN Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Work-family practices; Socially responsible human resource management; Discourse analysis; Work-family integration; Qualitative research; APPLYING SENS CAPABILITIES; SUSTAINABILITY; ORGANIZATIONS; SUPPORT; HR; INITIATIVES; EXPLORATION; LEADERSHIP; FRAMEWORK; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-020-04458-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The question of work-family practices commonly arises in both theory and daily practice as a matter of responsibility in today's organisations. More information is needed about them for socially responsible human resource management (SR-HRM). In this article our interest is in how work-family practices, serve as an important element of SR-HRM, constructed as (un)helpful for employees' work-family integration, are realised in organisational life. We investigate the discursive ways in which members of two different organisations working at different organisational levels construct the issue in the Finnish context. Three discourses were interpreted: (1) a discourse of compliance with external pressure, (2) a discourse of negotiation and (3) a discourse of individual flexibility. Discursive constructions of work-family practices make visible the complex interconnectedness of individuals and organisations with the environment in which they operate. Many organisational efforts to create positive work-family practices can, in fact, lead to failure to make these practices either available or usable, and they may result in the unjust treatment of organisation members. Creating sustainable work-family practices is a complex challenge for which SR-HRM must work out a solution.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 831
页数:17
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions [J].
Allen, TD .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 58 (03) :414-435
[2]   Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis [J].
Alvesson, M ;
Karreman, D .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2000, 53 (09) :1125-1149
[3]  
Andreassi JK, 2008, HANDBOOK OF WORK-FAMILY INTEGRATION: RESEARCH, THEORY, AND BEST PRACTICES, P331, DOI 10.1016/B978-012372574-5.50021-1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SAGE HDB ORG I
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, POP PROJ 2018 2070
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The global gender gap report
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods
[8]  
[Anonymous], YHTEISKUNTAPOLITIIKK
[9]   How Does Supervisory Family Support Influence Employees' Attitudes and Behaviors? A Social Exchange Perspective [J].
Bagger, Jessica ;
Li, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (04) :1123-1150
[10]   E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress [J].
Barley, Stephen R. ;
Meyerson, Debra E. ;
Grodal, Stine .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (04) :887-906