Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:15
作者
Johansson, Jennifer Viberg [1 ]
Bentzen, Heidi Beate [2 ]
Shah, Nisha [3 ]
Haraldsdottir, Eik [4 ]
Jonsdottir, Guobjorg Andrea [4 ]
Kaye, Jane [3 ,5 ]
Mascalzoni, Deborah [1 ,6 ]
Veldwijk, Jorien [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Res Eth & Bioeth, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Box 564, SE-75122 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Res Ctr Comp & Law, Fac Law, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Hlth Law & Emerging Technol, Fac Law, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Iceland, Social Sci Res Inst, Reykjavik, Iceland
[5] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Law & Emerging Technol, Melbourne Law Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Inst Biomed, Bolzano, Italy
[7] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
preferences; discrete choice experiment; health data; secondary use; willingness to share; LATENT CLASS MODEL; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; PRIVACY; CARE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.2196/29614
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital technological development in the last 20 years has led to significant growth in digital collection, use, and sharing of health data. To maintain public trust in the digital society and to enable acceptable policy-making in the future, it is important to investigate people's preferences for sharing digital health data. Objective: The aim of this study is to elicit the preferences of the public in different Northern European countries (the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, and Sweden) for sharing health information in different contexts. Methods: Respondents in this discrete choice experiment completed several choice tasks, in which they were asked if data sharing in the described hypothetical situation was acceptable to them. Latent class logistic regression models were used to determine attribute-level estimates and heterogeneity in preferences. We calculated the relative importance of the attributes and the predicted acceptability for different contexts in which the data were shared from the estimates. Results: In the final analysis, we used 37.83% (1967/5199) questionnaires. All attributes influenced the respondents' willingness to share health information (P<.001). The most important attribute was whether the respondents were informed about their data being shared. The possibility of opting out from sharing data was preferred over the opportunity to consent (opt-in). Four classes were identified in the latent class model, and the average probabilities of belonging were 27% for class 1, 32% for class 2, 23% for class 3, and 18% for class 4. The uptake probability varied between 14% and 85%, depending on the least to most preferred combination of levels. Conclusions: Respondents from different countries have different preferences for sharing their health data regarding the value of a review process and the reason for their new use. Offering respondents information about the use of their data and the possibility to opt out is the most preferred governance mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Aitken Mhairi, 2018, Int J Popul Data Sci, V3, P429, DOI 10.23889/ijpds.v3i1.429
[2]   Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies [J].
Aitken, Mhairi ;
Jorre, Jenna de St. ;
Pagliari, Claudia ;
Jepson, Ruth ;
Cunningham-Burley, Sarah .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 17 :1-24
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, GUID 05 2020 CONS RE GUID 05 2020 CONS RE
[4]   Making Big Data Useful for Health Care: A Summary of the Inaugural MIT Critical Data Conference [J].
Badawi, Omar ;
Brennan, Thomas ;
Celi, Leo Anthony ;
Feng, Mengling ;
Ghassemi, Marzyeh ;
Ippolito, Andrea ;
Johnson, Alistair ;
Mark, Roger G. ;
Mayaud, Louis ;
Moody, George ;
Moses, Christopher ;
Naumann, Tristan ;
Nikore, Vipan ;
Pimentel, Marco ;
Pollard, Tom J. ;
Santos, Mauro ;
Stone, David J. ;
Zimolzak, Andrew .
JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 2 (02) :41-51
[5]   Effects coding in discrete choice experiments [J].
Bech, M ;
Gyrd-Hansen, D .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (10) :1079-1083
[6]  
Bentzen H., 2021, HDB EUROPEAN DATA PR
[7]   Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Lloyd, Andrew ;
Prosser, Lisa A. ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Mauskopf, Josephine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :403-413
[8]   Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research [J].
Budin-Ljosne, Isabelle ;
Teare, Harriet J. A. ;
Kaye, Jane ;
Beck, Stephan ;
Bentzen, Heidi Beate ;
Caenazzo, Luciana ;
Collett, Clive ;
D'Abramo, Flavio ;
Felzmann, Heike ;
Finlay, Teresa ;
Javaid, Muhammad Kassim ;
Jones, Erica ;
Katic, Visnja ;
Simpson, Amy ;
Mascalzoni, Deborah .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 18
[9]   THE SCALE-ADUSTED LATENT CLASS MODEL: APPLICATION TO MUSEUM VISITATION [J].
Burke, Paul F. ;
Burton, Christine ;
Huybers, Twan ;
Islam, Towhidul ;
Louviere, Jordan J. ;
Wise, Chelsea .
TOURISM ANALYSIS, 2010, 15 (02) :147-165
[10]   Making sense of patient priorities: applying discrete choice methods in primary care using 'think aloud' technique [J].
Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh ;
Bower, Peter ;
Mead, Nicola ;
McDonald, Ruth ;
Whalley, Diane ;
Roland, Martin .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2007, 24 (03) :276-282