The size of an attentional window affects working memory guidance

被引:13
作者
Hernandez, Mireia [2 ]
Costa, Albert [3 ,4 ]
Humphreys, Glyn W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Psychol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Catalan Inst Res & Adv Studies, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Pompeu Fabra Univ, Barcelona, Spain
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
VISUAL-SEARCH; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; CAPTURE; COLOR;
D O I
10.3758/APP.72.4.963
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We ask whether attentional guidance from working memory (WM) is influenced by the size of an attentional window. Participants adopted either a focused or a diffuse attentional window when responding to a search display. Prior to the search display an initial cue had to be held in memory (Experiment 1A, visual WM; Experiment 1C, verbal WM) or merely identified (Experiment 1B, identification). In all cases, search performance was affected by the re-presentation of the cue in the search display, with the cuing effects (either cost or benefit) being larger when the cue was held in memory than when it was merely identified. Critically, the magnitude of the cuing benefit increased when participants adopted a diffuse attentional window. This held for effects that are based on items held in WM and for effects that are based only on item priming. The results suggest that variations in the size of an attentional window modulate top-down (both WM conditions) as well as bottom-up guidance of attention (identification condition).
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 972
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load [J].
Belke, Eva ;
Humphreys, Glyn W. ;
Watson, Derrick G. ;
Meyer, Antje S. ;
Telling, Anna L. .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2008, 70 (08) :1444-1458
[2]   The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons [J].
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Zwaan, Laura ;
Theeuwes, Jan ;
Kramer, Arthur F. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (05) :934-938
[3]   A NEURAL BASIS FOR VISUAL-SEARCH IN INFERIOR TEMPORAL CORTEX [J].
CHELAZZI, L ;
MILLER, EK ;
DUNCAN, J ;
DESIMONE, R .
NATURE, 1993, 363 (6427) :345-347
[4]   Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention [J].
Downing, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (06) :467-473
[5]   A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy [J].
Forster, KI ;
Forster, JC .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2003, 35 (01) :116-124
[6]  
Gibson B.S., 2001, Attraction, distraction, and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture, P51, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0166-4115(01)80005-4
[7]  
KIM J, 2010, DIFFERENTIATIN UNPUB
[8]   What Drives Memory-Driven Attentional Capture? The Effects of Memory Type, Display Type, and Search Type [J].
Olivers, Christian N. L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (05) :1275-1291
[9]   Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory [J].
Soto, D ;
Heinke, D ;
Humphreys, GW ;
Blanco, MJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2005, 31 (02) :248-261
[10]   Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection [J].
Soto, David ;
Humphreys, Glyn W. ;
Rotshtein, Pia .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (43) :17186-17191