Agentic Things and Traumatized People in Toni Morrison' s The Bluest Eye

被引:0
作者
Zhou, Quan [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Qiping [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Int Studies Univ, Sch English Studies, English, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Beijing Int Studies Univ, English, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Toni Morrison; The Bluest Eye; eclectic new materialism; things; MATERIALISM;
D O I
10.2979/jmodelite.45.3.08
中图分类号
I [文学];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
Toni Morrison's The Bluest Eye, when seen from the perspective of "thing theory" and other new materialist discourses, challenges the dominant anthropocentric mode of relationship between humans and things. In the novel, ostensibly inanimate things exert their agencies over the survival, less physical than spiritual, of socially oppressed African Americans. Morrison complicates "thing theory" and extremist new materialist thinking by initiating the development of an eclectic new materialism, which foregrounds the vibrancy of quotidian objects while also integrating it into human agency through the co-habitation of space, thus creating a harmonious and balanced network of hybrid agencies that can be both troubling and stabilizing.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 120
页数:16
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Ahmed Sara., 2006, Orientations, Objects, Others
[2]  
Ahmed Sara., 2007, New Formations, P121
[3]   Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter [J].
Barad, K .
SIGNS, 2003, 28 (03) :801-831
[4]  
Bennett Jane., 2010, Vibrant Matters: The Political Ecology of Things
[5]   The embarrassment of being human A critique of new materialism and object-oriented ontology [J].
Boysen, Benjamin .
ORBIS LITTERARUM, 2018, 73 (03) :225-242
[6]  
Brown Bill., 2003, SENSE THINGS OBJECT
[7]  
Brown Bill., 2004, Things, P1
[8]  
Bump J, 2010, COLL LITERATURE, V37, P147
[9]  
Fadem Maureen E. Ruprecht, 2020, Objects and Intertexts in Toni Morrison's 'Beloved': The Case for Reparations
[10]   People Without Things [J].
Fowles, Severin .
ANTHROPOLOGY OF ABSENCE: MATERIALIZATIONS OF TRANSCENDENCE AND LOSS, 2010, :23-41