A comparative study of ideation mechanisms used in eco-innovation tools

被引:38
|
作者
Tyl, Benjamin [1 ]
Legardeur, Jeremy [2 ,3 ]
Millet, Dominique [4 ]
Vallet, Flore [5 ]
机构
[1] APESA, F-64210 Bidart, France
[2] ESTIA, F-64210 Bidart, France
[3] Univ Bordeaux, IMS, F-33405 Talence, France
[4] SeaTech, LISMMA EoS Res Grp, F-83957 La Garde, France
[5] Univ Technol Compiegne, Ctr Pierre Guillaumat, Lab Roberval, UMR 7337,CNRS, Compiegne, France
关键词
ideation mechanism; experiment; eco-ideation; eco-innovation; DESIGN; CREATIVITY; ECODESIGN; RULES;
D O I
10.1080/09544828.2014.992772
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Today the challenges of sustainable development require new products, services or uses to be developed within the framework of an eco-innovation process integrating environmental and societal approaches. Creating such offers can be sometimes based upon using eco-innovation tools that focus on the idea generation phase and ideation mechanisms that allow stakeholders to redefine problems and develop new eco-creative concepts. This paper is focused on the comparison of the ideation mechanisms during the idea generation phase of eco-innovative concepts, called the eco-ideation phase. For this, it describes a set of academic and industrial studies taking into account the different ideation mechanisms. The tests compare an adapted creativity tool with existing eco-innovation tools regarding their performances during eco-ideation phases. In a second step, additional case studies are performed with the adapted creativity tool for eco-innovation, to assess whether this performance is maintained in various contexts and with various participants (in knowledge and skills). The results showed that the use of appropriate ideation mechanisms ensures a constant rate of idea generation throughout the eco-ideation session and a wide variety of ideas generated.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 345
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ECO-INNOVATION IN SUSTAINABILITY TRANSFORMATION AND INTERNAL COMPANY DYNAMICS TRIGGERING ECO-INNOVATION DECISIONS
    Yurdakul, Melek
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI IKTISADI VE IDARI BILIMLER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2023, 14 (28): : 709 - 733
  • [22] Integrating services and tools in an ICT platform to support eco-innovation in SMEs
    Buttol, Patrizia
    Buonamici, Roberto
    Naldesi, Luciano
    Rinaldi, Caterina
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    Masoni, Paolo
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2012, 14 (02) : 211 - 221
  • [23] Eco-innovation and openness: Mapping the growth trajectories and the knowledge structure of open eco-innovation
    Sanni, Maruf
    Verdolini, Elena
    SUSTAINABLE FUTURES, 2022, 4
  • [24] Integrating services and tools in an ICT platform to support eco-innovation in SMEs
    Patrizia Buttol
    Roberto Buonamici
    Luciano Naldesi
    Caterina Rinaldi
    Alessandra Zamagni
    Paolo Masoni
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2012, 14 : 211 - 221
  • [25] DETERMINANTS OF ECO-INNOVATION: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICES SECTORS
    Garcia-Pozo, Alejandro
    Gemar, German
    Sevilla-Sevilla, Claudia
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 15 (07): : 1473 - 1479
  • [26] Eco-Innovation Maturity Model: A Framework to Support the Evolution of Eco-Innovation Integration in Companies
    Xavier, Amanda
    Reyes, Tatiana
    Aoussat, Ameziane
    Luiz, Leandro
    Souza, Lucas
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [27] ECO-INNOVATION IN THE VALUE CHAIN
    McAloone, T. C.
    Mougaard, K.
    Restrepo, J.
    Knudsen, S.
    11TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE (DESIGN 2010), VOL 1-3, 2010, : 855 - 864
  • [28] Eco-innovation and Sustainable Development
    Ilic, Silvana
    Petrovic, Tanja
    Djukic, Gordana
    PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU, 2022, 17 (02): : 197 - 203
  • [29] Patents as a measure for eco-innovation
    Oltra, Vanessa
    Kemp, Rene
    de Vries, Frans P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 13 (02) : 130 - 148
  • [30] Regional eco-innovation trajectories
    Hansmeier, Hendrik
    Losacker, Sebastian
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2024, 32 (06) : 1401 - 1422