Conservation of marine biodiversity on a very large deep continental margin: how representative is a very large offshore reserve network for deep-water octocorals?

被引:13
作者
Althaus, Franziska [1 ]
Williams, Alan [1 ]
Alderslade, Philip [1 ]
Schlacher, Thomas A. [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Sci & Engn, Maroochydore, Qld 4558, Australia
关键词
Alcyonacea; continental slope; coral; deep sea; marine protected area; outer shelf; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; HABITAT HETEROGENEITY; IMPACTS; MEGABENTHOS; SUITABILITY; SEAMOUNTS; FISHERIES; SELECTION; RICHNESS; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12501
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
AimTo evaluate the conservation performance of Australia's continental-scale network of marine reserves for deep-water octocorals using three criteria: (1) Representation: what fraction of the sampled deep-water octocoral fauna within Australia's marine jurisdiction is contained in reserves?; (2) Species turnover: to what degree do reserves share species with non-protected areas?; and (3) Biodiversity: do existing reserves spatially maximize protection of species richness? LocationAustralia's continental exclusive economic zone and Norfolk Island region. MethodsA new Australia-wide, taxonomically consistent, dataset for distributions of deep-water octocorals (>80m depth) is used to calculate metrics of reserve performance for Australia's national marine reserve network. ResultsAustralia's reserve network represents 52% (270 of 518 species) of deep-water octocoral species. Coral representation is roughly proportional to spatial extent of reserves in different regions. The proportion of species with joint distributions in reserves and non-reserves ranges between 0% and 27% of the regional species pool; this may be a reflection of the high species turnover between sampling sites, and to some extent may also reflect sparse sampling coverage. Sites inside reserves have comparable species richness, contain similar numbers of rare species and do not differ in taxonomic diversity to sites outside reserves. Main conclusionsAustralia's marine reserve network is a significant investment in conservation. The first broad biological evaluation of the network's performance, using deep-water octocorals, indicates that whilst the level of species representation is broadly proportional to the network's spatial coverage, reserves do not appear to be areas of significantly higher octocoral biodiversity compared to areas outside reserves and that there is low species representation within highly protected (IUCN I or II) zones. Considering constraints on reserve expansion and spatial re-configuration, off-reserve' management tools (e.g. fishery closures, environmentally responsible practices by extractive industries) are likely to be important to enhance overall conservation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 103
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]  
DOTE, 2012, COMM MAR RES OV
[22]  
DOTE, 2014, COMM MAR RES BACKGR
[23]   Living on the edge: the sponge fauna of Australia's southwestern and northwestern deep continental margin [J].
Fromont, Jane ;
Althaus, Franziska ;
McEnnulty, Felicity R. ;
Williams, Alan ;
Salotti, Mark ;
Gomez, Oliver ;
Gowlett-Holmes, Karen .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2012, 687 (01) :127-142
[24]   Should We Protect the Strong or the Weak? Risk, Resilience, and the Selection of Marine Protected Areas [J].
Game, Edward T. ;
Mcdonald-Madden, Eve ;
Puotinen, Marji L. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (06) :1619-1629
[25]   Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness [J].
Gotelli, NJ ;
Colwell, RK .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 4 (04) :379-391
[26]   Application of biophysical information to support Australia's representative marine protected area program [J].
Harris, Peter T. ;
Heap, Andrew D. ;
Whiteway, Tanya ;
Post, Alix .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (10) :701-711
[27]   Quantifying Fish Assemblages in Large, Offshore Marine Protected Areas: An Australian Case Study [J].
Hill, Nicole A. ;
Barrett, Neville ;
Lawrence, Emma ;
Hulls, Justin ;
Dambacher, Jeffrey M. ;
Nichol, Scott ;
Williams, Alan ;
Hayes, Keith R. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10)
[28]   Tradeoffs in marine reserve design: habitat condition, representation, and socioeconomic costs [J].
Klein, Carissa J. ;
Tulloch, Vivitskaia J. ;
Halpern, Benjamin S. ;
Selkoe, Kimberly A. ;
Watts, Matthew E. ;
Steinback, Charles ;
Scholz, Astrid ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2013, 6 (05) :324-332
[29]   Seamount benthic macrofauna off southern Tasmania: community structure and impacts of trawling [J].
Koslow, JA ;
Gowlett-Holmes, K ;
Lowry, JK ;
O'Hara, T ;
Poore, GCB ;
Williams, A .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2001, 213 :111-125
[30]   Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning [J].
Kukkala, Aija S. ;
Moilanen, Atte .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2013, 88 (02) :443-464