Methodological, Theoretical, Infrastructural, and Design Issues in Conducting Good Outcome Studies

被引:7
作者
Kelly, Michael P. [1 ]
Moore, Tessa A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Hlth & Clin Excellence NICE, Ctr Publ Hlth Excellence, London WC1V 6NA, England
[2] London Borough Richmond Upon Thames, Sch Effectiveness Educ Childrens & Cultural Serv, London, England
关键词
methodological article; evidence-based practice mixed-methods; outcome study; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; FRAMEWORK; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1177/1049731511405070
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This article outlines a set of methodological, theoretical, and other issues relating to the conduct of good outcome studies. The article begins by considering the contribution of evidence-based medicine to the methodology of outcome research. The lessons which can be applied in outcome studies in nonmedical settings are described. The article then examines the role of causal pathways between interventions and outcomes and especially the importance of delineating them in advance of undertaking investigations. The development of designs based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with fully articulated causal pathways is described. Ways of supplementing RCTs with methods to highlight elements in the causal pathway in outcome studies are indicated. The importance of adhering to best practice in reporting and analysis is also noted.
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 653
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7499): : 1056 - 1057
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, REALIST SYNTHESIS IN
  • [3] [Anonymous], PUBLIC HLTH EVIDENCE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470693926
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2006, EVIDENCE BASED POLIC
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2008, DEV EVALUATING COMPL
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2005, GUIDE COMMUNITY PREV
  • [8] [Anonymous], Public Health, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0033-3506(02)00027-6
  • [9] Synthesizing diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews
    Baxter, S.
    Killoran, A.
    Kelly, M. P.
    Goyder, E.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 124 (02) : 99 - 106
  • [10] From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium
    Berkman, LF
    Glass, T
    Brissette, I
    Seeman, TE
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (06) : 843 - 857