Absence of lymphatics at the bone-implant interface - Implications for periprosthetic osteolysis

被引:13
|
作者
Edwards, James [1 ]
Schulze, Eva [1 ]
Sabokbar, Afsie [1 ]
Gordon-Andrews, Helen [1 ]
Jackson, David [2 ]
Athanasou, Nicholas Anthony [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dept Pathol, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Headington, England
[2] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Inst Mol Med, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/17453670710015175
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Wear particles, found at the bone-implant interface surrounding a loose prosthesis, are commonly phagocytosed by macrophages. Wear particles and wear particle-containing macrophages are also found in regional lymph nodes draining arthroplasty tissues. The means by which wear particles are transported from arthroplasty tissues to lymph nodes is uncertain, as the presence or absence of lymphatic vessels in periprosthetic tissues has not been established. Methods We determined immunophenotypic expression of LYVE-I and podoplanin, two highly specific lymphatic endothelial cell markers, in the hip arthroplasty pseudocapsule surrounding the false joint and the bone-implant interface of the femoral and acetabular pseudomembrane. Results LYVE-1+/podoplanin+ lymphatic vessels were not identified in the pseudomembrane but were found in the pseudocapsule. Normal bone did not contain lymphatic vessels. Interpretation Our findings suggest that the wear particles shed at the bone-implant interface are not transported to draining lymph nodes by lymphatics directly from the pseudomembrane, but via the pseudocapsule. The absence of a lymphatic clearance mechanism may contribute to accumulation of wear particles at the bone-implant interface and promote periprosthetic osteolysis through stimulation of osteoclast formation and activity.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study with speckle interferometry of bone-implant interface conditions
    Simoes, J
    Monteiro, J
    Vaz, M
    Taylor, M
    Blatcher, S
    EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, VOLS 1 AND 2: ADVANCES IN DESIGN, TESTING AND ANALYSIS, 1998, : 851 - 855
  • [22] ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF THE BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE
    ROLAND, K
    DUFIEF, MP
    SHERIDAN, R
    HEUSON, JA
    MICRON AND MICROSCOPICA ACTA, 1987, 18 (03): : 209 - 209
  • [23] Effect of loading frequency on deformations at the bone-implant interface
    Xie, Shuqiao
    Manda, Krishnagoud
    Pankaj, Pankaj
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2019, 233 (12) : 1219 - 1225
  • [24] HISTOLOGY AT THE BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE IN CEMENTED AND NONCEMENTED ENDOPROSTHESES
    HERREN, T
    REMAGEN, W
    SCHENK, R
    ORTHOPADE, 1987, 16 (03): : 239 - 251
  • [26] Titania nanotubes for orchestrating osteogenesis at the bone-implant interface
    Gulati, Karan
    Maher, Shaheer
    Findlay, David M.
    Losic, Dusan
    NANOMEDICINE, 2016, 11 (14) : 1847 - 1864
  • [27] Ultrasonic Interferometric Procedure for Quantifying the Bone-Implant Interface
    Luetzelberger, Jan
    Arneth, Philipp
    Franck, Alexander
    Drese, Klaus Stefan
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (13)
  • [28] Optimization of stress distribution of bone-implant interface (BII)
    Zhang, Chunyu
    Zeng, Chunyu
    Wang, Zhefu
    Zeng, Ting
    Wang, Yuehong
    BIOMATERIALS ADVANCES, 2023, 147
  • [29] Optical bone chambers as tools for studying the bone-implant interface: A review
    Winet, H
    CELLS AND MATERIALS, 1995, 5 (03): : 293 - 308
  • [30] Nanoscale characterization of bone-implant interface and biomechanical modulation of bone ingrowth
    Clark, Paul A.
    Clark, Andrew M.
    Rodriguez, Anthony
    Hussain, Mohammad A.
    Mao, Jeremy J.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-BIOMIMETIC AND SUPRAMOLECULAR SYSTEMS, 2007, 27 (03): : 382 - 393