A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis

被引:101
作者
Martin, Andrea E. [1 ]
McElree, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
verb-phrase ellipsis; sentence processing; speed-accuracy tradeoff;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.010
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Interpreting a verb-phrase ellipsis (VP ellipsis) requires accessing an antecedent in memory, and then integrating a representation of this antecedent into the local context. We investigated the online interpretation of VP ellipsis in an eye-tracking experiment and four speed-accuracy tradeoff. experiments. To investigate whether the antecedent for a VP ellipsis is accessed with a search or direct-access retrieval process, Experiments 1 and 2 measured the effect of the distance between an ellipsis and its antecedent on the speed and accuracy of comprehension. Accuracy was lower with longer distances, indicating that interpolated material reduced the quality of retrieved information about the antecedent. However, contra a search process, distance did not affect the speed of interpreting ellipsis. This pattern suggests that antecedent representations are content-addressable and retrieved with a direct-access process. To determine whether interpreting ellipsis involves copying antecedent information into the ellipsis site, Experiments 3-5 manipulated the length and complexity of the antecedent. Some types of antecedent complexity lowered accuracy, notably, the number of discourse entities in the antecedent. However, neither antecedent length nor complexity affected the speed of interpreting the ellipsis. This pattern is inconsistent with a copy operation, and it suggests that ellipsis interpretation may involve a pointer to extant structures in memory. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 906
页数:28
相关论文
共 73 条
[21]   Memory-load interference in syntactic processing [J].
Gordon, PC ;
Hendrick, R ;
Levine, WH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (05) :425-430
[22]   Memory interference during language processing [J].
Gordon, PC ;
Hendrick, R ;
Johnson, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (06) :1411-1423
[23]   Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial complexity [J].
Grodner, D ;
Gibson, E .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2005, 29 (02) :261-290
[24]   Comparison of the retrieval of item versus spatial position information [J].
Gronlund, SD ;
Edwards, MB ;
Ohrt, DD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1997, 23 (05) :1261-1274
[25]  
Judd C.M., 2011, Data analysis: A model comparison approach
[26]   A THEORY OF READING - FROM EYE FIXATIONS TO COMPREHENSION [J].
JUST, MA ;
CARPENTER, PA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1980, 87 (04) :329-354
[27]  
Kehler A., 2002, Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar
[28]   Movement out of control [J].
Landau, I .
LINGUISTIC INQUIRY, 2003, 34 (03) :471-498
[29]   Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension [J].
Lewis, Richard L. ;
Vasishth, Shravan ;
Van Dyke, Julie A. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (10) :447-454
[30]   An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval [J].
Lewis, RL ;
Vasishth, S .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2005, 29 (03) :375-419