Assessing the potential of low-carbon technologies in the German energy system

被引:15
作者
Kumar, Subhash [1 ]
Loosen, Maximilian [2 ]
Madlener, Reinhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Sch Business & Econ, Inst Future Energy Consumer Needs & Behav FCN, EON Energy Res Ctr, Mathieustr 10, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Templergraben 55, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
关键词
CO2; mitigation; EnergyPlan model; Energy systems; Germany; Low carbon technologies; Smart grid; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY; EMISSIONS; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; TRANSITION; INNOVATION; SIMULATION; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110345
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the introduction of its energy concept in 2010, the German government set ambitious targets for the country's energy and climate policy. According to this concept, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will have to be reduced by 80% by 2050, as compared to 1990 levels, and renewables will have to supply 80% of all electricity needs by the same year. Additionally, Germany has decided to phase out its nuclear energy by 2022. This study investigates the possible components to achieve these targets. The analysis is based on an hourly simulation model EnergyPlan. Three scenarios are developed to investigate the potential development of the German energy supply system until 2050. The results indicate renewable shares of 92% and 81% for scenarios B and A, respectively, by 2050 compared to 69% in the reference scenario. The proposed renewable energy system is even found to involve lower costs than today's energy system (i.e. total annual cost for scenario B is (sic) 260 bn compared to (sic) 293 bn in the reference scenario). The results show that a massive decarbonization of the German energy system until 2050 seems technically and economically feasible, if smart grid costs are disregarded and if this sustainable energy transformation is accompanied by political and genuine public willingness to actually achieve the set goals and take the necessary steps.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   Simulation-based optimization of sustainable national energy systems [J].
Bjelic, Ilija Batas ;
Rajakovic, Nikola .
ENERGY, 2015, 91 :1087-1098
[22]   Economic implications of reducing carbon emissions from energy use and industrial processes in Brazil [J].
Chen, Y. -H. Henry ;
Timilsina, Govinda R. ;
Landis, Florian .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 130 :436-446
[23]   Economics of renewable energy expansion and security of supply: A dynamic simulation of the German electricity market [J].
Coester, Andreas ;
Hofkes, Marjan W. ;
Papyrakis, Elissaios .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 231 :1268-1284
[24]  
Connolly D., 2014, Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag., V1, P7, DOI DOI 10.5278/IJSEPM.2014.1.2
[25]   The relative importance of sources of greenhouse-gas emissions: Comparison of global through subnational perspectives [J].
Cushman, RM ;
Jones, SB .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 29 (03) :360-372
[26]   A Romanian energy system model and a nuclear reduction strategy [J].
Gota, Dan-Ioan ;
Lund, Henrik ;
Miclea, Liviu .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (11) :6413-6419
[27]   Full energy system transition towards 100% renewable energy in Germany in 2050 [J].
Hansen, Kenneth ;
Mathiesen, Brian Vad ;
Skov, Iva Ridjan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 102 :1-13
[28]   The reference forecast of the German energy transition-An outlook on electricity markets [J].
Knaut, Andreas ;
Tode, Christian ;
Lindenberger, Dietmar ;
Malischek, Raimund ;
Paulus, Simon ;
Wagner, Johannes .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 92 :477-491
[29]   Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint [J].
Lin, Boqiang ;
Zhu, Junpeng .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 247 :662-671
[30]   Combining multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and descriptive analytical modelling in energy scenario design [J].
Mahbub, Md Shahriar ;
Cozzini, Marco ;
Ostergaard, Poul Alberg ;
Alberti, Fabrizio .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 164 :140-151