The impact of surgical margin status on prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
作者
Zhang, B. [1 ]
Zhou, J. [1 ]
Wu, S. [1 ]
Guo, M. [1 ]
Zhang, Y. [1 ]
Liu, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Dept Urol, Second Hosp, 23 Pingjiang Rd, Tianjin, Peoples R China
关键词
Surgical margin status; Radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer-specific mortality; Meta-analysis; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; RISK; ANTIGEN; METASTASIS; PATHOLOGY; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; FAILURE; LENGTH; GRADE;
D O I
10.1007/s12094-020-02358-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Until now, there is no clear conclusion on the relationship between the surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy (RP) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis based on all eligible case-control studies. Methods A systematic and comprehensive literature search was performed based on PUBMED and EMBASE to identify all of the potentially relevant publications which were published before September 2019. Hazard ratio (HR) for PCSM was independently extracted by two reviewers from all eligible studies. Pooled HR estimates with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were computed by Stata12.0. Results Total 15 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that patients with positive surgical margin (PSM) after RP may have higher PCSM than those who had a negative surgical margin (HR 1.44, P = 0.043). In the subgroup analysis, we found that no matter whether the pathological stage of the patients is T2 or T3, PSM is indicative of a high PCSM and that the PCSM of T3 is higher than T2 (Pathological stage T3, HR 1.77, P = 0.032; Pathological stage T2, HR 1.56, P = 0.003). In addition, by performing the subgroup analysis of Gleason score, we concluded that both Gleason score 8-10 and Gleason score <= 7 would increase the risk of PCSM, and the former was more significant than the latter (Gleason score 8-10, HR 1.88, P < 0.001; Gleason score <= 7, HR 1.38, P = 0.039). Moreover, PSM increased PCSM regardless of whether the patients received radiation therapy or not (radiation therapy, HR 1.92, P < 0.001; no radiation therapy, HR 1.42, P < 0.001). Conclusions This meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with PSM after RP may have an elevated PCSM. However, to evaluate these correlations in more details, it is necessary to conduct further studies on a larger sample size.
引用
收藏
页码:2087 / 2096
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ATSUSHI K, 2018, JPN J CLIN ONCOL
[2]   Impact of preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of high-risk prostate cancer [J].
Baack Kukreja, Janet ;
Bathala, Tharakeswara K. ;
Reichard, Chad A. ;
Troncoso, Patricia ;
Delacroix, Scott ;
Davies, Benjamin ;
Eggener, Scott ;
Smaldone, Marc ;
Minhaj Siddiqui, Mohummad ;
Tollefson, Matthew ;
Chapin, Brian F. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2020, 23 (01) :172-178
[3]   Biochemical recurrence-free survival and pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer [J].
Beauval, Jean-Baptiste ;
Roumiguie, Mathieu ;
Filleron, Thomas ;
Benoit, Thibaut ;
de la Taille, Alexandre ;
Malavaud, Bernard ;
Salomon, Laurent ;
Soulie, Michel ;
Ploussard, Guillaume .
BMC UROLOGY, 2016, 16
[4]   Predictors of prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy: 10year oncologic outcomes from the Victorian Radical Prostatectomy Registry [J].
Bolton, Damien M. ;
Papa, Nathan ;
Ta, Anthony D. ;
Millar, Jeremy ;
Davidson, Adee-Jonathan ;
Pedersen, John ;
Syme, Rodney ;
Patel, Manish I. ;
Giles, Graham G. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 :66-72
[5]   Evaluation of modern pathological criteria for positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens and their use for predicting biochemical recurrence [J].
Bong, Gary W. ;
Ritenour, Chad W. M. ;
Osunkoya, Adeboye O. ;
Smith, M. Timothy ;
Keane, Thomas E. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (03) :327-331
[6]   Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality [J].
Chalfin, Heather J. ;
Dinizo, Michael ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth ;
Han, Misop .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) :1684-1689
[7]   Clinical significance of the positive surgical margin based upon location, grade, and stage [J].
Fleshner, Neil E. ;
Evans, Andrew ;
Chadwick, Karen ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan ;
Zlotta, Alexandre .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2010, 28 (02) :197-204
[8]   Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization [J].
Fontenot, Philip A. ;
Mansour, Ahmed M. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (08) :E290-E299
[9]   Clinical effect of a positive surgical margin without extraprostatic extension after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Hashimoto, Takeshi ;
Yoshioka, Kunihiko ;
Horiguchi, Yutaka ;
Inoue, Rie ;
Yoshio, Ohno ;
Nakashima, Jun ;
Tachibana, Masaaki .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (12) :503.e1-503.e6
[10]   Radical prostatectomy in Denmark: Survival analysis and temporal trends in clinicopathological parameters with up to 20 years of follow-up [J].
Heering, Mikael ;
Berg, Kasper Drimer ;
Brasso, Klaus ;
Iversen, Peter ;
Roder, Martin Andreas .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2017, 26 (01) :21-27