The Implications of the Cognitive Sciences for the Relation Between Religion and Science Education: The Case of Evolutionary Theory

被引:13
作者
Blancke, Stefaan [1 ]
De Smedt, Johan [1 ]
De Cruz, Helen [2 ]
Boudry, Maarten [1 ]
Braeckman, Johan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Philosophy & Moral Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Louvain, Ctr Log & Analyt Philosophy, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
TELEOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS; ESSENTIALIST BELIEFS; EARLY UNDERSTANDINGS; INTELLIGENT DESIGN; NATURAL WORLD; CHILDREN; GOD; MISCONCEPTIONS; CONCEPTIONS; PREFERENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11191-011-9402-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the relationship between religion and science education in the light of the cognitive sciences. We challenge the popular view that science and religion are compatible, a view that suggests that learning and understanding evolutionary theory has no effect on students' religious beliefs and vice versa. We develop a cognitive perspective on how students manage to reconcile evolutionary theory with their religious beliefs. We underwrite the claim developed by cognitive scientists and anthropologists that religion is natural because it taps into people's intuitive understanding of the natural world which is constrained by essentialist, teleological and intentional biases. After contrasting the naturalness of religion with the unnaturalness of science, we discuss the difficulties cognitive and developmental scientists have identified in learning and accepting evolutionary theory. We indicate how religious beliefs impede students' understanding and acceptance of evolutionary theory. We explore a number of options available to students for reconciling an informed understanding of evolutionary theory with their religious beliefs. To conclude, we discuss the implications of our account for science and biology teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:1167 / 1184
页数:18
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, THEOLOGICAL INCORREC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1964, On the Origin of Species
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Descartes' Baby: How Child Development Explains What Makes Us Human
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The Blind Watchmaker
[5]  
Atran S., 1994, MAPPING MIND, P316
[6]   TELEOLOGICAL EXPLANTIONS IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY [J].
AYALA, FJ .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1970, 37 (01) :1-+
[7]  
Bardapurkar A., 2008, Evolution: Education and Outreach, V7, P299, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S12052-008-0048-5, 10.1007/s12052-008-0048-5]
[8]  
Barrett H.C., 2004, Journal of Cognition and Culture, V4, P25
[9]  
Barrett H.C., 2001, Mind and Society, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02512073
[10]   Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts [J].
Barrett, JL ;
Keil, FC .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (03) :219-247