The effectiveness of person-centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review

被引:60
作者
Ratti, V. [1 ]
Hassiotis, A. [1 ]
Crabtree, J. [2 ]
Deb, S. [3 ]
Gallagher, P. [4 ]
Unwin, G. [5 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Psychiat, 6th Floor Maple House,149 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7NF, England
[2] Mile End Hosp, Tower Hamlets Community Learning Disabil Serv, Beaumont House,Bancroft Rd, London E1 4DG, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Dept Med, Ctr Mental Hlth, 7th Floor Commonwealth Bldg, London W12 0NN, England
[4] St Pancras Hosp, Camden & Islington Fdn Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, London NW1 0PE, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Sch Psychol, Frankland Bldg, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
Systematic-review; Person-centred planning; Intellectual disability; Learning disability; Care; Outcomes; POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORTS; HEALTH-CARE; LEARNING-DISABILITIES; LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; OUTCOMES; ADULTS; CHECKLIST; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.015
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of Person-Centred Planning (PCP) on outcomes for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) across the age range. Method: The electronic databases PsycInfo, Embase, CINHAL, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Medline were searched for studies evaluating the impact of PCP on people with ID, published between 1990 and 2014; these were supplemented by manual searches of reference lists. Studies were considered irrespective of methodology, sample size and publication source, if outcomes reflected the impact of PCP on individuals with ID. Results: Seven quantitative, five qualitative and four mixed methods studies were included in the review. The overall quality of the evidence was low but suggestive that PCP may have a positive, yet moderate, impact on some outcomes for individuals with ID, particularly community-participation, participation in activities and daily choice-making. For other outcomes such as employment the findings were inconsistent. Conclusion: The evidence supporting the effectiveness of PCP is limited and does not demonstrate that PCP can achieve radical transformations in the lives of people with ID. Clearer descriptions of PCP and its components are needed. Small-scale successful demonstrations of effectiveness exist, but its clinical, cost-effectiveness and wider implementation must be investigated in large scale studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 84
页数:22
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Adams L., 2006, BRIT J LEARN DISABIL, V34, P68, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-3156.2005.00356.X
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010 2020 NAT DIS ST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Intellectual disability and social inclusion e-book: A critical review
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Challenging behaviour and learning disabilities: Prevention and interventions for people with learning disabilities whose behaviour challenges
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, BMJ
[6]  
[Anonymous], PERSON CTR PLANNING
[7]  
[Anonymous], EPIDEMIOL PSYCHIAT S
[8]   Positive behavior supports in general education settings: Combining person-centered planning and functional analysis [J].
Artesani, AJ ;
Mallar, L .
INTERVENTION IN SCHOOL AND CLINIC, 1998, 34 (01) :33-38
[9]   Intervention mapping: A process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs [J].
Bartholomew, LK ;
Parcel, GS ;
Kok, G .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 25 (05) :545-563
[10]   Developing a person-centred support service for families caring for children with severe learning disabilities in rural and urban areas [J].
Black, Lesley-Ann ;
Mcconkey, Roy ;
Roberts, Paul ;
Ferguson, Pauline .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2010, 14 (02) :111-131