Vote Secrecy and Voter Feedback in Remote Voting - Can We Have Both?

被引:0
作者
Koitmae, Arne [1 ]
Willemson, Jan [2 ]
Vinkel, Priit [2 ]
机构
[1] State Electoral Off, Lossi Plats 1a, Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Cybernetica, Narva Mnt 20, Tartu, Estonia
来源
ELECTRONIC VOTING, E-VOTE-ID 2021 | 2021年 / 12900卷
关键词
Voting feedback; Freedom of voting; Secrecy of vote; Internet voting; Remote voting; BALLOT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7_10
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The principle of secrecy is one of the most important tools to guarantee a voting process without undue influence to the voter. However, the concepts of the secret ballot and secret vote have strong ties to voting in a controlled environment in the polling station, and remote voting methods like postal voting or Internet voting need to employ special measures and approaches to achieve similar results. At the same time, limited options of observing the tallying process remotely potentially undermines the trust in remote voting. This paper looks at possible ways of giving the voter some feedback and assurance in the integrity of their vote, at the same time adhering to the freedom of voting principle. The Estonian Internet voting system is used as a model case for evaluation of a possible feedback channel architecture.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 154
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, CCPR GEN COMMENT NO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, Code of Good Practice in Election Matters
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, CONST JUDGM 3 4 1 13
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, E VAL TURV TOOR KOON
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, CASE ECH 2020 1 002
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, STAT INTERNET VOTING
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1950, EUR CONV HUM RIGHTS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, E VOTING ONLINE VOTI
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1966, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2014, ECLINLRBDHA20145657