Genetic relationships between peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and closely related wild species using SSR markers

被引:3
|
作者
Foulongne, M [1 ]
Minier, J [1 ]
Pascal, T [1 ]
Kervella, J [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Unite Genet & Ameliorat Fruits & Legumes, F-84919 Avignon, France
关键词
microsatellites; genetic diversity; germplasm; breeding strategy;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.663.112
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The genetic relationships between several genitors used in peach breeding programmes, including two commercial peach cultivars [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch], six peach seed-propagated rootstocks and six accessions of related wild species including Prunus mira, Prunus kansuensis and Prunus davidiana, were studied using 28 SSR markers. The total number of alleles revealed by SSR analysis varied from 3 to 9 with an average of 6.2. The level of heterozygosity ranged from 5% to 58% and was much higher in wild species (27%) than in peach genotypes (16%). Low levels were found in seed-propagated rootstocks 'Bailey', 'Pamirskij 5 ' and 'Rubira (respectively 3.7, 3.8, and 8%) and for autogamous wild species P. kansuensis and P. mira (respectively 4 and 5%). At the opposite, the highest values (from 32 to 58%) were found in allogamous wild species Prunus davidiana. Cluster analysis of these data emphasized the distinction between the peaches and wild-related species, according to their geographical origin. Polymorphism between these two groups reached 85%. Moreover, a total of 89 and 65 alleles were specific to wild species and peach respectively, whereas only 19 were common to both germplasms. Wild species closely related to Prunus persica thus appear as an interesting source of variability for peach. These results provide a soundbasis to manage breeding programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 633
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Genetic relationships between apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) and related species using AFLP markers.
    Hagen, LS
    Lambert, P
    Audergon, JM
    Khadari, B
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MOLECULAR MARKERS FOR CHARACTERIZING GENOTYPES AND IDENTIFYING CULTIVARS IN HORTICULTURE, 2001, (546): : 205 - 208
  • [42] Effects of tree size on water use of peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch)
    Goodwin, I
    Whitfield, DM
    Connor, DJ
    IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2006, 24 (02) : 59 - 68
  • [43] Molecular Characterization of Local Spanish Peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] Germplasm
    A. Wünsch
    M. Carrera
    J. I. Hormaza
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2006, 53 : 925 - 932
  • [44] Mapping QTLs controlling fruit quality in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)
    Dirlewanger, E
    Moing, A
    Rothan, C
    Svanella, L
    Pronier, V
    Guye, A
    Plomion, C
    Monet, R
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1999, 98 (01) : 18 - 31
  • [45] Molecular characterization of local spanish peach [Prunus persica (L.) batsch] germplasm
    Wünsch, A
    Carrera, M
    Hormaza, JI
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2006, 53 (05) : 925 - 932
  • [46] Genetic Diversity in Peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] at the University of Florida: Past, Present, and Future
    Chavez, Dario J.
    Chaparro, Jose X.
    Beckman, Thomas G.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2011, 46 (09) : S131 - S131
  • [47] Acclimatization and escape of the peach, Prunus persica L. batsch and its importance in Hungary
    Suranyi, D
    FOURTH INTERNATIONAL PEACH SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-2, 1998, (465): : 261 - 268
  • [48] Effects of tree size on water use of peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch)
    Ian Goodwin
    Desmond M. Whitfield
    David J. Connor
    Irrigation Science, 2006, 24 : 59 - 68
  • [49] The potential of Prunus davidiana for introgression into peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] assessed by comparative mapping
    M. Foulongne
    T. Pascal
    P. Arús
    J. Kervella
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2003, 107 : 227 - 238
  • [50] Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Relationships of Wild and Cultivated Peach (Prunus persica L.)
    Meng, Fanjuan
    Peng, Mu
    Guan, Fachun
    HORTSCIENCE, 2015, 50 (01) : 44 - 50