Study on the Optimization and Stability of Machine Learning Runoff Prediction Models in the Karst Area

被引:5
作者
Mo, Chongxun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Guangming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lei, Xingbi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Mingshan [4 ]
Ruan, Yuli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lai, Shufeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xing, Zhenxiang [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Univ, Coll Architecture & Civil Engn, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Univ, Guangxi Prov Engn Res Ctr Water Secur & Intellige, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Key Lab Disaster Prevent & Struct Safety, Minist Educ, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Hydrol & Water Resources Bur Yellow Rive, Dongying 257000, Peoples R China
[5] Northeast Agr Univ, Sch Water Conservancy & Civil Engn, Harbin 150030, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 10期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
support vector machine; Elman neural network; multi-model mean model; model stability; runoff prediction; Chengbi River Karst Basin;
D O I
10.3390/app12104979
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Runoff prediction plays an extremely important role in flood prevention, mitigation, and the efficient use of water resources. Machine learning runoff prediction models have become popular due to their high computational efficiency. To select a model with a better runoff simulation and to validate the stability of the model, the following studies were done. Firstly, the support vector machine Model (SVM), the Elman Neural Network Model (ENN), and the multi-model mean model (MMM) were used for the runoff prediction, with the monthly runoff data from 1963-2007 recorded by the Pingtang hydrological station in the Chengbi River Karst Basin, China. Secondly, the comprehensive rating index method was applied to select the best model. Thirdly, the indicators of the hydrologic alteration-range of variability approach (IHA-RVA) was introduced to measure the model stability with different data structure inputs. According to the comprehensive rating index method, the SVM model outperformed the other models and was the best runoff prediction model with a score of 0.53. The overall change of the optimal model was 10.52%, which was in high stability.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural rivers using a cluster-based Bayesian network
    Alizadeh, Mohamad Javad
    Shahheydari, Hosein
    Kavianpour, Mohammad Reza
    Shamloo, Hamid
    Barati, Reza
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 76 (02)
  • [2] Reverse Flood Routing in Rivers Using Linear and Nonlinear Muskingum Models
    Badfar, Meisam
    Barati, Reza
    Dogan, Emrah
    Tayfur, Gokmen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2021, 26 (06)
  • [3] Reduced and Earlier Snowmelt Runoff Impacts Traditional Irrigation Systems
    Bai, Yining
    Fernald, Alexander
    Tidwell, Vincent
    Gunda, Thushara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATION, 2019, 168 (01) : 10 - 28
  • [4] Application of excel solver for parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum models
    Barati, Reza
    [J]. KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2013, 17 (05) : 1139 - 1148
  • [5] SUPPORT-VECTOR NETWORKS
    CORTES, C
    VAPNIK, V
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 1995, 20 (03) : 273 - 297
  • [6] Daily streamflow prediction using support vector machine-artificial flora (SVM-AF) hybrid model
    Dehghani, Reza
    Poudeh, Hassan Torabi
    Younesi, Hojatolah
    Shahinejad, Babak
    [J]. ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2020, 68 (06) : 1763 - 1778
  • [7] Groundwater level forecasting in Northern Bangladesh using nonlinear autoregressive exogenous (NARX) and extreme learning machine (ELM) neural networks
    Di Nunno Fabio
    S. I. Abba
    Bao Quoc Pham
    Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam
    Swapan Talukdar
    Granata Francesco
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (7)
  • [8] Rainfall-runoff prediction at multiple timescales with a single Long Short-Term Memory network
    Gauch, Martin
    Kratzert, Frederik
    Klotz, Daniel
    Nearing, Grey
    Lin, Jimmy
    Hochreiter, Sepp
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (04) : 2045 - 2062
  • [9] Harrison MSJ., 1995, ECMWF SEMINAR P PRED, V2, P61
  • [10] Hosseini K, 2016, KSCE J CIV ENG, V20, P468