Effect of visual displays and locations on laparoscopic surgical training task

被引:17
作者
Rogers, Meghan L. [1 ]
Heath, Will B. [1 ]
Uy, Chad C. [1 ]
Suresh, Sameerajan [1 ]
Kaber, David B. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Edward P Fitts Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Monitor position; IMAGE DISPLAY; SURGERY; MANIPULATION; PERFORMANCE; ATTENTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.010
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The number of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures has substantially increased since its introduction due to health and recovery benefits for patients. However, there are potential performance issues in MIS for surgeons due to perceptual processing demands associated with supporting technologies. Monitor location has been identified as a major factor influencing performance in these types of procedures. This study examined the effect of multiple monitors on performance during a laparoscopic surgical training task (peg transfer among instruments). Twenty-four novice subjects were exposed to different monitor conditions including a default position, a biomechanically compatible position, and a position collocated with the operating surface as well as the combination of the latter two. Subjective rankings and cognitive workload were also assessed. Results revealed a significant effect of monitor position on task time when compared to subjects' baseline training task time using the default monitor setup. Collocating the monitor with the operating surface was shown to be superior in terms of task time. There were no significant differences among monitor positions in terms of perceived workload. The results of this study provide an applicable guide for the design of MIS setups in the operating room to promote surgeon performance. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 767
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, Experimental designs and data analysis for biologists
  • [2] Bailey R.W., 1993, HUM FACT ERG SOC ANN, V37, P282
  • [3] The operating room of the future: what, when, and why?
    Berci, G
    Phillips, EH
    Fujita, F
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [4] Cullen Karen A, 2009, Natl Health Stat Report, P1
  • [5] DeLucia P.R., 2008, HUMAN FACTORS ERGONO, V52, P894
  • [6] Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery, 2010, FLS MAN SKILLS INSTR
  • [7] An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills
    Gallagher, AG
    McClure, N
    McGuigan, J
    Ritchie, K
    Sheehy, NP
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (07) : 617 - 620
  • [8] Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display
    Hanna, GB
    Shimi, SM
    Cuschieri, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (04) : 481 - 484
  • [9] Hanna GB, 1997, BRIT J SURG, V84, P1460
  • [10] Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions
    Haveran, Liam A.
    Novitsky, Yuri W.
    Czerniach, Donald R.
    Kaban, Gordie K.
    Taylor, Melinda
    Gallagher-Dorval, Karen
    Schmidt, Richard
    Kelly, John J.
    Litwin, Demetrius E. M.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (06): : 980 - 984