Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on stacked autoencoder and gaussian mixture regression

被引:37
|
作者
Wei, Meng [1 ]
Ye, Min [1 ]
Wang, Qiao [1 ]
Xinxin-Xu [1 ]
Twajamahoro, Jean Pierre [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Natl Engn Lab Highway Maintenance Equipment, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Rwanda, Kigali 3900, Rwanda
[3] Coll Sci & Technol, Kigali 3900, Rwanda
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy storage systems; Lithium-ion batteries; Remaining useful life; Stacked autoencoder; Gaussian mixture regression; HEALTH ESTIMATION; STATE; PROGNOSTICS; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; CHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2021.103558
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Lithium-ion batteries have been widely applied in energy storage systems and electric vehicles (EVs), the remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is one of the critical technologies for prognostics and health management. However, high accuracy RUL prediction with reliability is the biggest bottleneck. To improve RUL prediction and adaptively extract indirect health indicators (HIs), the RUL prediction framework based on the stacked autoencoder and Gaussian mixture regression (SAE-GMR) is proposed. Firstly, the indirect HIs are extracted from charging and discharging data, and the gray relation analysis (GRA) is adopted to analyze the relation with capacity. In this paper, the SAE neural network is proposed to reduce the dimensions and noise of battery and obtain a syncretic HI. Then, the GMR model is estiblished not only to improve accuracy of RUL prediction, but also describe the reliability. Finally, the proposed method is compared with esixting methods,which shows that the proposed model has superiority for other methods.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Gaussian Processes Mixture
    Li, Lingling
    Wang, Pengchong
    Chao, Kuei-Hsiang
    Zhou, Yatong
    Xie, Yang
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [2] A Hybrid Approach Based on Gaussian Process Regression and LSTM for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-ion Batteries
    Guo, Xiaoyu
    Yang, Zikang
    Liu, Yujia
    Fang, Zhendu
    Wei, Zhongbao
    2023 IEEE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE & EXPO, ITEC, 2023,
  • [3] Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Health Indicator and Gaussian Process Regression Model
    Liu, Jian
    Chen, Ziqiang
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 39474 - 39484
  • [4] Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on Gaussian process regression with self-constructed kernel
    Zhang R.
    Liu T.
    Jin G.
    Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (08): : 2623 - 2633
  • [5] Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Improved Support Vector Regression
    Xu J.
    Ni Y.
    Zhu C.
    Diangong Jishu Xuebao/Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36 (17): : 3693 - 3704
  • [6] A Bayesian Mixture Neural Network for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries
    Zhang, Shuxin
    Liu, Zhitao
    Su, Hongye
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION, 2022, 8 (04) : 4708 - 4721
  • [7] AttMoE: Attention with Mixture of Experts for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries
    Chen, Daoquan
    Zhou, Xiuze
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 84
  • [8] AttMoE: Attention with Mixture of Experts for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries
    Chen, Daoquan
    Zhou, Xiuze
    Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 84
  • [9] Probabilistic Prediction of Remaining Useful Life of Lithium-ion Batteries
    Zhang, Renjie
    Li, Jialin
    Chen, Yifei
    Tan, Shiyi
    Jiang, Jiaxu
    Yuan, Xinmei
    2022 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART POWER & INTERNET ENERGY SYSTEMS, SPIES, 2022, : 1820 - 1824
  • [10] A novel prediction method based on the support vector regression for the remaining useful life of lithium-ion batteries
    Zhao, Qi
    Qin, Xiaoli
    Zhao, Hongbo
    Feng, Wenquan
    MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2018, 85 : 99 - 108