'Mess, stress and trauma': students' experiences of formal contract cheating processes

被引:15
作者
Pitt, Penelope [1 ]
Dullaghan, Kevin [2 ]
Sutherland-Smith, Wendy [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, DUSA, Burwood, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning CRADLE, Geelong, Vic, Australia
关键词
Contract cheating; academic integrity; student experience; allegation; outcome; MARKET;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2020.1787332
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating is concerning educational institutions across the globe. Current knowledge of student perspectives on contract cheating is primarily informed by student surveys. Little is known about the student experience of being suspected of contract cheating and going through a formal university process. This study reports the findings of a qualitative study at an Australian university with student participants who had faced contract cheating allegations, using semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Five key themes emerged: 1) the most challenging experience of the student's life; 2) not telling their family about the allegation and managing any financial impact themselves; 3) stress and hypervigilance around future assignment submission; 4) rumours and reputational damage including changed relationships with academics and peers; and, 5) staying on track and guiding other students to practice academic integrity. Participants perceived the formal university process as a legal one, which contributed to it being a stressful and challenging experience. This was regardless of whether they had contract cheated or not. Recommendations for academic and support staff centre around ensuring formal university contract cheating processes are primarily a learning experience, from which students can emerge and progress to complete their studies.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 672
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? [J].
Amigud, Alexander ;
Dawson, Phillip .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (01) :98-108
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HDB ACAD INTEGRITY, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_58-1
[4]  
Bertram-Gallant T., 2016, J RES PRACTICE, V12, P1
[5]   Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship [J].
Bretag, Tracey ;
Harper, Rowena ;
Burton, Michael ;
Ellis, Cath ;
Newton, Philip ;
van Haeringen, Karen ;
Saddiqui, Sonia ;
Rozenberg, Pearl .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (05) :676-691
[6]   Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students [J].
Bretag, Tracey ;
Harper, Rowena ;
Burton, Michael ;
Ellis, Cath ;
Newton, Philip ;
Rozenberg, Pearl ;
Saddiqui, Sonia ;
van Haeringen, Karen .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (11) :1837-1856
[7]   Can we detect contract cheating using existing assessment data? Applying crime prevention theory to an academic integrity issue [J].
Clare J. ;
Walker S. ;
Hobson J. .
International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13 (1)
[8]  
Clarke R, 2006, P 2 INT PLAG C GAT U P 2 INT PLAG C GAT U
[9]   How Prevalent is Contract Cheating and to What Extent are Students Repeat Offenders? [J].
Curtis G.J. ;
Clare J. .
Journal of Academic Ethics, 2017, 15 (2) :115-124
[10]   Can software improve marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating? A pilot study of the Turnitin authorship investigate alpha [J].
Dawson, Phillip ;
Sutherland-Smith, Wendy ;
Ricksen, Mark .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (04) :473-482