Ratio estimation in SIMS analysis

被引:97
作者
Ogliore, R. C. [1 ]
Huss, G. R. [1 ]
Nagashima, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Hawaii Inst Geophys & Planetol, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
Secondary ion mass spectrometry; Ratio; Isotope measurement; Statistics; Bias;
D O I
10.1016/j.nimb.2011.04.120
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The determination of an isotope ratio by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) traditionally involves averaging a number of ratios collected over the course of a measurement. We show that this method leads to an additive positive bias in the expectation value of the estimated ratio that is approximately equal to the true ratio divided by the counts of the denominator isotope of an individual ratio. This bias does not decrease as the number of ratios used in the average increases. By summing all counts in the numerator isotope, then dividing by the sum of counts in the denominator isotope, the estimated ratio is less biased: the bias is approximately equal to the ratio divided by the summed counts of the denominator isotope over the entire measurement. We propose a third ratio estimator (Beale's estimator) that can be used when the bias from the summed counts is unacceptably large for the hypothesis being tested. We derive expressions for the variance of these ratio estimators as well as the conditions under which they are normally distributed. Finally, we investigate a SIMS dataset showing the effects of ratio bias, and discuss proper ratio estimation for SIMS analysis. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1910 / 1918
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1977, The advanced theory of statistics
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1962, IND ORGAN
[3]   Pb isotopic analysis of standards and samples using a 207Pb-204Pb double spike and thallium to correct for mass bias with a double-focusing MC-ICP-MS [J].
Baker, J ;
Peate, D ;
Waight, T ;
Meyzen, C .
CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2004, 211 (3-4) :275-303
[4]  
Bevington P.R., 2003, DATA REDUCTION ERROR
[5]  
FLUECK JA, 1976, J APPL METEOROL, V15, P535, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1976)015<0535:REASIP>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
Greenwood M, 1908, BIOMETRIKA, V6, P376
[8]   UNBIASED RATIO ESTIMATORS [J].
HARTLEY, HO ;
ROSS, A .
NATURE, 1954, 174 (4423) :270-271
[9]   MONTE CARLO COMPARISON OF SOME RATIO ESTIMATORS [J].
HUTCHISON, MC .
BIOMETRIKA, 1971, 58 (02) :313-+
[10]   EFFICIENT TESTS FOR NORMALITY, HOMOSCEDASTICITY AND SERIAL INDEPENDENCE OF REGRESSION RESIDUALS [J].
JARQUE, CM ;
BERA, AK .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1980, 6 (03) :255-259