Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: A critical review

被引:148
作者
Amaral, Flavia L. B. [1 ]
Colucci, Vivian [1 ]
Palma-Dibb, Regina G. [1 ]
Corona, Silmara A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Operat Dent, Ribeirao Preto Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00134.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
One factor that has a great influence on clinical performance of dental restorations is their resistance to degradation. Morphological changes in the structure of tooth-restoration interface aged in the oral environment have been reported. However, even though the in vivo performance is the ultimate testing environment for predicting the behavior of restorations because of the complexity of intraoral conditions, in vitro models such as thermocycling, mechanical loading, pH cycling, and aging of materials in distilled water, NaOCl, and food-simulating solutions may provide important information about the fundamental mechanisms involved in resin-tooth interface degradation. Most recently, the effect of host-derived enzymes and the storage in deproteinizing solutions (such as aqueous NaOCl) on the degradation of resin-dentin bonds has also been described. This review considers the importance of these in vitro methods on bond durability interface in an attempt to understand the behavior of restoratives over time. The first section is focused on the mechanism of in vivo biodegradation, whereas the second looks at studies that have described the influence of water storage, NaOCl storage, host-derived matrix metalloproteinases, thermocycling, mechanical loading, pH cycling, and food-simulating solutions on the degradation of the adhesive interface. It is obvious that these methodologies do not occur separately in the oral cavity, but that each one has a specific importance in the mechanisms of bond degradation.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 353
页数:14
相关论文
共 119 条
  • [1] Aguilar Luciana Tibirica, 2002, Pesqui Odontol Bras, V16, P37, DOI 10.1590/S1517-74912002000100007
  • [2] Alani AH, 1997, OPER DENT, V22, P173
  • [3] ANDERSON D J, 1956, J Dent Res, V35, P664, DOI 10.1177/00220345560350050201
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, 11265 ISO
  • [5] The influence of water storage and C-factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin
    Armstrong, SR
    Keller, JC
    Boyer, DB
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2001, 17 (03) : 268 - 276
  • [6] Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials
    Bagheri, R
    Burrow, MF
    Tyas, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2005, 33 (05) : 389 - 398
  • [7] Bates J F, 1975, J Oral Rehabil, V2, P349, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1975.tb01535.x
  • [8] EFFECT OF CROSS-LINKING AGENT CONTENT, MONOMER FUNCTIONALITY, AND REPEAT UNIT CHEMISTRY ON PROPERTIES OF UNFILLED RESINS
    BEATTY, MW
    SWARTZ, ML
    MOORE, BK
    PHILLIPS, RW
    ROBERTS, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1993, 27 (03): : 403 - 413
  • [9] Bedran-De-Castro AKB, 2004, AM J DENT, V17, P337
  • [10] Bedran-de-Castro AKB, 2004, J ADHES DENT, V6, P221