Animal Welfare Assessment System for Sustainable Cattle Production in Indonesia

被引:0
作者
Fathurahman, Iqbal [1 ]
Jamilah, Istianah Maryam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Vet Med, Jalan Fauna Karangmalang, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
来源
UGM ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE LIFE SCIENCES 2016 | 2019年
关键词
Animal welfare; Cattle production; Assessment; System; Sustainable; QUALITY; EUROPE;
D O I
10.18502/kls.v4i11.3865
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The demand of a sustainable system to evaluate animal welfare in farming practices are now increasing. Indonesia as a developing country still have a problem in maintaining their animal welfare assessment system especially in cattle production. The lack of information and regulation about animal welfare in cattle farming practices affects the deprived animal welfare practices in the field. Poor animal welfare resulting in low efficacy of animal production. The quality of animal products is now judged in relation to the ethics of production including impact on the animal's welfare, direct features, and consequences for consumers. In this paper, we suggest the concept of the animal welfare assessment system for sustainable cattle production in Indonesia which are based on protocols, human resources, and government. These three main elements in the animal welfare assessment system will be integrated to build a sustainable cattle production through better animal welfare practices. Enhanced animal welfare practice in cattle production chain will follow the sustainable production. We expect the implementation of this assessment system will give more value to the Indonesian cattle products in order to compete with international beef and dairy products.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 199
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, CT983678 U READ EU
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Innovation for a sustainable future - the eco-innovation action plan (Eco-AP)
  • [3] [Anonymous], MARKETING FARM ANIMA
  • [4] Blokhuis H.J., 2008, Trends in Food Science Technology, V19, pS79, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TIFS.2008.09.007
  • [5] Animal welfare: the attitudes and behaviour of European pig farmers
    Bock, B. B.
    van Huik, M. M.
    [J]. BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2007, 109 (11): : 931 - 944
  • [6] Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: a review of existing methods
    Botreau, R.
    Bonde, M.
    Butterworth, A.
    Perny, P.
    Bracke, M. B. M.
    Capdeville, J.
    Veissier, I.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2007, 1 (08) : 1179 - 1187
  • [7] Animal welfare and meat quality: The perspective of Uruguay, a "small" exporter country
    del Campo, M.
    Brito, G.
    Montossi, F.
    de Lima, J. M. Soares
    Julian, R. San
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2014, 98 (03) : 470 - 476
  • [8] Del Campo M, 2006, INIA-Produccion Animal, P7
  • [9] FAO, 2008, FAO EXP M ROM
  • [10] Fraser D, 2008, ACTA VET SCAND, V50, DOI 10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1