A fast sequential transient stability preventive control approach driven by model interpretation

被引:1
作者
Ren, Junyu [1 ]
Li, Benyu [2 ]
Zhao, Ming [2 ]
Shi, Hengchu [2 ]
You, Hao [2 ]
Chen, Jinfu [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Adv Electromagnet Engn & Technol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Elect Power Dispatching & Control Ctr, Kunming, Peoples R China
关键词
Data-driven application; Generation rescheduling; Model interpretation; Preventive control; Transient stability assessment; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108214
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Transient stability preventive control (TSPC), regarded as generation rescheduling, plays an important role in maintaining secure and economic dispatch of power systems. To accommodate the increasing uncertainty of operation conditions, online TSPC is urgently required in real power systems. To this end, a new sequential online TSPC strategy driven by transient stability assessment (TSA) model interpretation is proposed in this paper. In this strategy, two data-driven TSA models, namely full-feature-trained and controllable-feature -trained models, are deployed for online TSA and generation rescheduling, respectively. To identify the control generators for TSPC, an instance-based model interpretation tool, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), is introduced to interpret the unstable operation detected by online TSA. In addition, a pair-wise generator regulation strategy and a continual prediction method are used to quickly search the TSPC operating point while ensuring the power shift balance of the system during regulation. The adaptability of the strategy to the online applications is demonstrated on the IEEE 3-machine 9-bus system and the IEEE 10-machine 39-bus system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in north America and Europe, and recommended means to improve System Dynamic Performance [J].
Andersson, G ;
Donalek, P ;
Farmer, R ;
Hatziargyriou, N ;
Kamwa, I ;
Kundur, P ;
Martins, N ;
Paserba, J ;
Pourbeik, P ;
Sanchez-Gasca, J ;
Schulz, R ;
Stankovic, A ;
Taylor, C ;
Vittal, V .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (04) :1922-1928
[2]   Real-Time Prediction and Control of Transient Stability Using Transient Energy Function [J].
Bhui, Pratyasa ;
Senroy, Nilanjan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (02) :923-934
[3]   Application of differential evolution algorithm for transient stability constrained optimal power flow [J].
Cai, H. R. ;
Chung, C. Y. ;
Wong, K. P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (02) :719-728
[4]   Stability-constrained optimal power flow [J].
Gan, DQ ;
Thomas, RJ ;
Zimmerman, RD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (02) :535-540
[5]   A Two-Level Parallel Decomposition Approach for Transient Stability Constrained Optimal Power Flow [J].
Geng, Guangchao ;
Jiang, Quanyuan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2012, 27 (04) :2063-2073
[6]  
Geoffrey EHinton., 2012, IMPROVING NEURAL NET
[7]   Support Vector Machine-Based Algorithm for Post-Fault Transient Stability Status Prediction Using Synchronized Measurements [J].
Gomez, Francisco R. ;
Rajapakse, Athula D. ;
Annakkage, Udaya D. ;
Fernando, Ioni T. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (03) :1474-1483
[8]   A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models [J].
Guidotti, Riccardo ;
Monreale, Anna ;
Ruggieri, Salvatore ;
Turin, Franco ;
Giannotti, Fosca ;
Pedreschi, Dino .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2019, 51 (05)
[9]   Neural-Network Security-Boundary Constrained Optimal Power Flow [J].
Gutierrez-Martinez, Victor J. ;
Canizares, Claudio A. ;
Fuerte-Esquivel, Claudio R. ;
Pizano-Martinez, Alejandro ;
Gu, Xueping .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (01) :63-72
[10]   An Enhanced Numerical Discretization Method for Transient Stability Constrained Optimal Power Flow [J].
Jiang, Quanyuan ;
Huang, Zhiguang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (04) :1790-1797