Teamwork online: The effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction, and postdiscussion accuracy

被引:62
作者
Thompson, LF
Coovert, MD
机构
[1] E Carolina Univ, Dept Psychol, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Psychol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1089-2699.7.2.135
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigated the impact of computer-mediated communication on teamwork by examining 40 4-person teams working in either face-to-face or computer conferencing environments. Results were consistent with the belief that computer-mediated teams have trouble maintaining mutual knowledge. Compared with their face-to-face counterparts, computer-mediated teams viewed their discussions as more confusing and less satisfying, spent more time devising decisions, and felt less content with their outcomes. Discussion time mediated the relationship between the communication medium and outcome satisfaction. Confusion and outcome dissatisfaction predicted inaccuracies when members independently recorded team decisions; accordingly, the electronic communication medium reduced decision recording accuracy. By clarifying several shortcomings associated with computer conferencing, these results can be used to inform choices when selecting and developing effective team communication media.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 151
页数:17
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   GROUP PROCESSES IN FACE-TO-FACE AND COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION [J].
ADRIANSON, L ;
HJELMQUIST, E .
BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 10 (04) :281-296
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, GROUP DYN-THEOR RES, DOI DOI 10.1037/1089-2699.2.2.82
[3]   A COMPARISON OF COMPUTER CONFERENCES WITH FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS FOR SMALL-GROUP BUSINESS DECISIONS [J].
ARCHER, NP .
BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 9 (04) :307-317
[4]   JUDGMENT ACCURACY AND OUTCOMES IN NEGOTIATION - A CAUSAL-MODELING ANALYSIS OF DECISION-AIDING EFFECTS [J].
ARUNACHALAM, V ;
DILLA, WN .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 61 (03) :289-304
[5]   Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis [J].
Baltes, BB ;
Dickson, MW ;
Sherman, MP ;
Bauer, CC ;
LaGanke, JS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 87 (01) :156-179
[6]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[7]   Impacts of asynchronous learning networks on individual and group problem solving: A field experiment [J].
Benbunan-Fich, R ;
Hiltz, SR .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 1999, 8 (05) :409-426
[8]  
Bordia P., 1997, J BUSINESS COMMUNICA, V34, P99, DOI [10.1177/002194369703400106, DOI 10.1177/002194369703400106]
[9]   IMPROVING GROUP-PERFORMANCE BY TRAINING IN INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM-SOLVING [J].
BOTTGER, PC ;
YETTON, PW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (04) :651-657
[10]   DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURE AND DECISION QUALITY [J].
BURLESON, BR ;
LEVINE, BJ ;
SAMTER, W .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1984, 10 (04) :557-574