Coal fly ash as a soil conditioner for field crops in southern Ontario

被引:13
作者
Cline, JA [1 ]
Bill, M [1 ]
Torrenueva, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ontario Agr Coll, Dept Plant Agr, Simcoe, ON N3Y 4N5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900060035x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sixty-eight percent of the 957 000 Mg of fly ash (FA) from coal-fired generating stations in Ontario was landfilled in 1998. Current restrictions by government regulators prevent its use for agricultural purposes. Greenhouse and field experiments were therefore initiated to assess the effects of FA On plant growth. The objective of the greenhouse study was to evaluate various rates of FA (0-80 Mg ha(-1) equivalent) on soil pH, soil and plant nutrient le, eb, and plant growth using representative acidic clay and sandy soils from Southern Ontario. After 90 d of soil incubation, the highest rates of FA. increased sail pH, but had no significant effect on hot-water extractable B. Dry-weights of plants grown in the same soil types were unaffected by FA rates. In a 3-yr field study, Fit was applied to acidic clay and sandy loam soils at rates ranging from 0 to 50 Mg ha(-1) (drg wt. basis). Lime control treatments were also included. In Year 1, corn (Zen mays L) plant emergence, grain yield, percent moisture, and harvest index were not significantly influenced by FA applications. However, soybean [Glycine mar (L)Merr.] yields treated,with 50 Mg ha(-1) FA increased by as much as 35 and 31% in comparison with untreated and lime control treatments, respectively. Selenium and boron, while presently the rate-limiting elements for maximum permissible loading rates of FA for soil amendments in the province, did not accumulate in plants in quantities that would be of concern for plant health or animal and human consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:1982 / 1989
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   UTILIZATION AND DISPOSAL OF FLY-ASH AND OTHER COAL RESIDUES IN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS - A REVIEW [J].
ADRIANO, DC ;
PAGE, AL ;
ELSEEWI, AA ;
CHANG, AC ;
STRAUGHAN, I .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1980, 9 (03) :333-344
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, AGR USES MUNICIPAL A
[3]  
Baker D. E., 1982, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, P323
[4]  
BINGHAM FT, 1982, AGRONOMY, V9, P431
[5]   ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUES [J].
CARLSON, CL ;
ADRIANO, DC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1993, 22 (02) :227-247
[6]  
Carter M.R., 1993, SOIL SAMPLING METHOD, DOI [10.1201/9781420005271, DOI 10.1201/9781420005271]
[7]  
CHAPMAN HD, 1965, DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA, P33
[8]  
ERICKSON AE, 1987, P 8 INT ASH UT S WAS
[9]   EVALUATION OF FLY-ASH AS A SOIL AMENDMENT FOR THE ATLANTIC COASTAL-PLAIN .1. SOIL HYDRAULIC-PROPERTIES AND ELEMENTAL LEACHING [J].
GHODRATI, M ;
SIMS, JT ;
VASILAS, BL .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 81 (3-4) :349-361
[10]  
MARTENS DC, 1971, COMPOST SCI, V12, P15