Survey on Cardiotocography Feature Extraction Algorithms for Foetal Welfare Assessment

被引:2
作者
Haritopoulos, M. [1 ]
Illanes, A. [2 ]
Nandi, A. K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Orleans, ENSI Bourges, PRISME Lab, EA 4229, F-28000 Chartres, France
[2] Univ Austral Chile, Fac Ciencias Ingn, Valdivia, Chile
[3] Brunel Univ, Elect & Comp Engn, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
来源
XIV MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTING 2016 | 2016年 / 57卷
关键词
cardiotocography; feature extraction; classification; foetal heart rate; foetal welfare assessment; HEART-RATE SIGNAL; WAVELET ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION; POWER; ACIDEMIA; ACIDOSIS; LABOR; BASE;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_230
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Since its inception forty years ago as a way to control birth process, the cardiotocograph (CTG) has emerged over time and became the undisputed leader worldwide of non-invasive intrapartum foetal monitoring systems. The CTG signals conveying a lot of information, it is very difficult to interpret them and act accordingly even for specialists; hence, researchers have started looking for characteristics which could be correlated with a particular pathological state of the foetus. Thereby, many features appeared in the literature, ranging from the most common ones to artificially generated features, and computed using a wide variety of signal processing-based analysis tools: time scale, spectral or non-linear analysis, to name but a few. This survey paper, presents in a hierarchical order the most common processing steps of a CTG signal and focuses primarily on the feature extraction methods for foetal heart rate (FHR) analysis reported in the literature during the last decade. Also, some feature classification methods are reported before a brief discussion which concludes this work.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1192
页数:6
相关论文
共 61 条
[31]   A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests [J].
Pardey, J ;
Moulden, M ;
Redman, CWG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (05) :1095-1103
[32]   Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation [J].
Parer, Julian T. ;
Hamilton, Emily F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (05) :451.e1-451.e7
[33]   A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns [J].
Parer, Julian T. ;
Ikeda, Tomoaki .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (01) :26.e1-26.e6
[34]  
Peeters G., 2004, J EVALUATION CLIN PR
[35]   Foetal heart rate power spectrum response to uterine contraction [J].
Romano, M. ;
Bifulco, P. ;
Cesarelli, M. ;
Sansone, M. ;
Bracale, M. .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2006, 44 (03) :188-201
[36]  
Romano M, 2013, 4 IEEE INT C E HLTH
[37]   Antepartum cardiotocography: A study of fetal reactivity in frequency domain [J].
Romano, Maria ;
Bracale, Marcello ;
Cesarelli, Mario ;
Campanile, Marta ;
Bifulco, Paolo ;
De Falco, Marianna ;
Sansone, Mario ;
Di Lieto, Andrea .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (06) :619-633
[38]  
Romano M, 2014, IEEE INT SYM MED MEA, P545
[39]  
Rooth GHA., 1987, Int J Gyneaecol Obstet, V25, P159, DOI DOI 10.1016/0020-7292(87)90012-9
[40]   Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings [J].
Salamalekis, E ;
Siristatidis, C ;
Vasios, G ;
Saloum, J ;
Giannaris, D ;
Chrelias, C ;
Prentza, A ;
Koutsouris, D .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2006, 32 (02) :135-139