An inter-centre quality assurance network for IMRT verification: Results of the ESTRO QUASIMODO project

被引:67
作者
Gillis, S
De Wagter, C
Bohsung, J
Perrin, B
Williams, P
Mijnheer, BJ
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Siemens, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[4] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
IMRT delivery; QA; radiographic film; multi-centre intercomparison; entire treatment chain;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: IMRT necessitates extension of existing inter-centre quality assurance programs due to its increased complexity. We assessed the feasibility of an inter-centre verification method for different IMRT techniques. Materials and methods: Eight European radiotherapy institutions of the QUASIMODO network, have designed an IMRT plan for a horseshoe-shaped PTV surrounding a cylindrical OAR in a simplified pelvic phantom. All centres applied common plan objectives but used their own equipment for planning and delivery. They verified the delivery of this plan according to a common protocol with radiographic film and ionisation chamber measurements. The irradiated films, the results of the ionisation chamber measurements and the computed dose distributions were sent to one analysis centre that compared the measured and computed dose distributions with the gamma method and composite dose-area histograms. Results: 4% (relative to the prescribed dose) and 3 mm (distance-to-agreement) were decided feasible gamma criteria. The composite dose-area histograms showed a maximum local deviation of 3.5% in the mean dose of the PTV and 5% in the OAR. Systematic differences could be identified, and in some cases explained. Conclusions: This multi-centre dosimetric verification study demonstrated both the feasibility of a multi-centre quality assurance network to evaluate any IMRT planning and delivery system combination, as well as the validity of the methodology involved. (C) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 353
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest
    Boyer, AL
    Butler, EB
    DiPetrillo, TA
    Engler, MJ
    Fraass, B
    Grant, W
    Ling, CC
    Low, DA
    Mackie, TR
    Mohan, R
    Purdy, JA
    Roach, M
    Rosenman, JG
    Verhey, LJ
    Wong, JW
    Cumberlin, RL
    Stone, H
    Palta, JR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04): : 880 - 914
  • [2] An EGSnrc Monte Carlo study of the microionization chamber for reference dosimetry of narrow irregular IMRT beamlets
    Capote, R
    Sánchez-Doblaclo, F
    Leal, A
    Lagares, JI
    Arráns, R
    Hartmann, GH
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (09) : 2416 - 2422
  • [3] Investigation of Kodak extended dose range (EDR) film for megavoltage photon beam dosimetry
    Chetty, IJ
    Charland, PM
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (20) : 3629 - 3641
  • [4] Variation of sensitometric curves of radiographic films in high energy photon beams
    Danciu, C
    Proimos, BS
    Rosenwald, JC
    Mijnheer, BJ
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (06) : 966 - 974
  • [5] QUALITY-CONTROL OF RADIOTHERAPY CENTERS IN EUROPE - BEAM CALIBRATION
    DUTREIX, A
    DERREUMAUX, S
    CHAVAUDRA, J
    VANDERSCHUEREN, E
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 32 (03) : 256 - 264
  • [6] Dutreix J, 1969, Ann N Y Acad Sci, V161, P33
  • [7] The ESTRO-QUALity assurance network (EQUAL)
    Ferreira, IH
    Dutreix, A
    Bridier, A
    Chavaudra, J
    Svensson, H
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 55 (03) : 273 - 284
  • [8] Normalized sensitometric curves for the verification of hybrid IMRT treatment plans with multiple energies
    Georg, D
    Kroupa, B
    Winkler, P
    Pötter, R
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1142 - 1150
  • [9] The IAEA/WHO TLD postal programme for radiotherapy hospitals
    Izewska, J
    Andreo, P
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 54 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [10] Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method
    Low, DA
    Dempsey, JF
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) : 2455 - 2464