From a 'just transition for us' to a 'just transition for all'

被引:9
作者
Galgoczi, Bela [1 ]
机构
[1] European Trade Union Inst, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
ust transition; inequality; trade unions; industrial relations; welfare state; automotive sector; eco-social state; JUSTICE; STATE;
D O I
10.1177/10242589221125066
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This article will demonstrate that, given the complexity of inequalities in the climate-environment-social nexus, fragmented policies for a just transition that focus on only one dimension of inequality will not deliver the results needed to justify proclaiming a 'just transition for all'. By reframing the sustainability trilemma for the case of the climate emergency and deconstructing the concept of a 'just transition' based on the relevant literature and selected case studies, we shall highlight some of the concept's inherent contradictions. The article will argue that a holistic approach requires a reframing of the role of the welfare state.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 366
页数:18
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Akguc M., 2022, ETUI POLICY BRIEF 20
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, AUTONEWS
[3]  
[Anonymous], Climate Data Explorer - CAIT Tools: Historical Emissions
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Governing Sustainability
[5]   The Environmental Paradox of the Welfare State: The Dynamics of Sustainability [J].
Bailey, Daniel .
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2015, 20 (06) :793-811
[6]   THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT [J].
BARBIER, EB .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1987, 14 (02) :101-110
[7]  
Bauer W., 2020, EMPLOYMENT 2030 EFFE
[8]  
BCG, 2021, IS E MOB GREEN BOOST
[9]  
Bergfeld M., 2019, JACOBIN MAGAZIN
[10]  
Brown, 2020, GERMAN STATE AWARDS