The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) Survey: Current Trends in Liposuction

被引:41
作者
Ahmad, Jamil
Eaves, Felmont F., III
Rohrich, Rod J. [1 ]
Kenkel, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Plast Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
patient safety; liposuction; UAL; SAL; PAL; LAL; survey; LASER-ASSISTED LIPOSUCTION; LARGE-VOLUME LIPOSUCTION; CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS; TRADITIONAL LIPOPLASTY; FLUID RESUSCITATION; SUCTION LIPECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MESOTHERAPY; LIPOLYSIS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1177/1090820X10395508
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The emergence of new technologies necessitates a study of current trends in liposuction and other methods for fat removal. Objective: The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) conducted a survey of its members to gain valuable information from Board-certified plastic surgeons about their experience with new technologies for fat removal and managing complications after liposuction. Methods: The ASAPS Current Trends in Liposuction Survey was emailed to 1713 ASAPS members. Data were tabulated and examined to determine current trends in liposuction and other fat removal techniques performed by ASAPS members. Results: The response rate for the survey was 28.7% (n = 492). Most ASAPS respondents reported performing between 50 and 100 liposuction procedures annually. Most plastic surgeons currently employ or have previous experience with suction-assisted lipectomy/liposuction (SAL), ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL), and power-assisted liposuction, but fewer reported experience with laser-assisted liposuction (LAL), mesotherapy, or external, noninvasive devices. SAL was the preferred method of fat removal for 51.4%. UAL, LAL, and SAL were most commonly associated with complications. Only 10.5% of ASAPS members employ LAL; 38% have treated a patient with complications secondary to LAL. Conclusions: Valuable information about current trends in liposuction and other fat removal techniques has been gained from this survey. Although many studies have been published that review issues related to safety, morbidity, aesthetics, and recovery after different methods of fat removal, more prospective studies with standardized objective outcome measures comparing these techniques, particularly newer modalities, are needed to continue improving safety-related standards of care.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 224
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [21] Ultrasound-assisted liposuction:: An analysis of 348 cases
    Graf, R
    Auersvald, A
    Damasio, RCC
    Rippel, R
    de Araújo, LRR
    Bigarelli, LHC
    Franck, CL
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 27 (02) : 146 - 153
  • [22] Efficacy of Lidocaine for Pain Control in Subcutaneous Infiltration During Liposuction
    Hatef, Daniel A.
    Brown, Spencer A.
    Lipschitz, Avron H.
    Kenkel, Jeffrey M.
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2009, 29 (02) : 122 - 128
  • [23] Horton JB, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V117, p61E, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000204796.65812.68
  • [24] HUGHES CE, 2001, AESTHETIC SURG J, V20, P120
  • [25] Tumescent liposuction versus internal ultrasonic-assisted tumescent liposuction - A side-to-side comparison
    Igra, H
    Satur, NM
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1997, 23 (12) : 1213 - 1218
  • [26] Practice advisory on liposuction
    Iverson, RE
    Lynch, DJ
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (05) : 1478 - 1490
  • [27] Jewell Mark Laurence, 2002, Aesthet Surg J, V22, P131, DOI 10.1067/maj.2002.123377
  • [28] Karmo FR, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V108, P241, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200107000-00039
  • [29] Power liposuction: A report on complications
    Katz, BE
    Bruck, MC
    Felsenfeld, L
    Frew, KE
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2003, 29 (09) : 925 - 927
  • [30] Laser-assisted lipolysis: A report on complications
    Katz, Bruce
    McBean, Jason
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COSMETIC AND LASER THERAPY, 2008, 10 (04) : 231 - 233