An Assessment of CYGNSS Normalized Bistatic Radar Cross Section Calibration

被引:25
作者
Said, Faozi [1 ,2 ]
Jelenak, Zorana [3 ]
Chang, Paul S. [3 ]
Soisuvarn, Seubson [4 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Global Sci & Technol Inc, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[2] NOAA, Ctr Satellite Applicat & Res, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[3] NOAA, Ctr Satellite Applicat & Res, Natl Environm Satellite Data & Informat Serv, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[4] King Mongkuts Inst Technol Ladkrabang, Dept Telecommun Engn, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
关键词
Geophysical measurements; global positioning system (GPS); microwave reflectometry; radar measurements; remote sensing; scattering; sea surface; wind; SCATTERING; OCEAN;
D O I
10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2849323
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A cyclone global navigation satellite system (CYGNSS) sigma(o) calibration analysis is presented using version 2.0 of the Level 1 dataset available on PO. DAAC. Three separate analyzes are conducted, namely, an examination of the specular bin location (in delay) and sigma(o) relationship, an investigation of the impact of recently improved characterizations of the GPS effective isotropically radiated power on CYGNSS sigma(o), and an intersatellite sigma(o) calibration analysis. We first noted a correlation between the specular delay bin location and sigma(o), where an increase in the specular delay bin resulted in an increase in sigma(o) regardless of the wind speed level; a specular delay bin location ranging from 4.75 to 5.00 and from 7.00 to 7.25 resulted in a 14.74 and 17.72 dB median sigma(o), respectively. Noticeable improvements in the median sigma(o) were present in the version 2.0 dataset, when separating the data by GPS block type: for blocks IIR, IIF, and IIR-M, median sigma(o) were 15.39, 15.42, and 15.10 dB, respectively (compared to 19.38, 20.53, and 21.38 dB in version 1.1). Finally, an unexpected correlation between the instrument noise floor and sigma(o) was observed for all eight observatories while conducting the intersatellite sigma(o) calibration analysis. Approximately 0-1 dB absolute sigma(o) difference biases (with up to similar to 1 dB standard deviation) between spacecrafts were observed. A report of this analysis was presented to CYGNSS scientists and engineers, who eventually found an issue with the D/A DDM scaling algorithm. We expect better statistical performances in future releases of the data.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 65
页数:16
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Andersen O.B., 2010, P 2 INT S GRAV FIELD
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, REMOTE SENSING SYSTE
[3]   Scatterometer-based assessment of 10-m wind analyses from the operational ECMWF and NCEP numerical weather prediction models [J].
Chelton, DB ;
Freilich, MH .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (02) :409-429
[4]   The CYGNSS Level 1 Calibration Algorithm and Error Analysis Based on On-Orbit Measurements [J].
Gleason, Scott ;
Ruf, Christopher S. ;
O'Brien, Andrew J. ;
McKague, Darren S. .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 12 (01) :37-49
[5]   Calibration and Unwrapping of the Normalized Scattering Cross Section for the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System [J].
Gleason, Scott ;
Ruf, Christopher S. ;
Clarizia, Maria Paola ;
O'Brien, Andrew J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 54 (05) :2495-2509
[6]   SPACEBORNE RADAR MEASUREMENT OF WIND VELOCITY OVER THE OCEAN - AN OVERVIEW OF THE NSCAT SCATTEROMETER SYSTEM [J].
NADERI, FM ;
FREILICH, MH ;
LONG, DG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1991, 79 (06) :850-866
[7]  
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2014, ISS RAPIDSCAT
[8]  
Office of Geomatics, 2018, WORLD GEOD SYST 1984
[9]   A global wave parameter database for geophysical applications. Part 2: Model validation with improved source term parameterization [J].
Rascle, Nicolas ;
Ardhuin, Fabrice .
OCEAN MODELLING, 2013, 70 :174-188
[10]  
Ruf ChristopherS., 2016, CYGNSS HDB