Estimating the impact of interventions against COVID-19: From lockdown to vaccination

被引:28
作者
Thompson, James [1 ]
Wattam, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Dept Math, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[2] W&P Acad Consultancy, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 12期
关键词
HERD-IMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0261330
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease of humans caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since the first case was identified in China in December 2019 the disease has spread worldwide, leading to an ongoing pandemic. In this article, we present an agent-based model of COVID-19 in Luxembourg, and use it to estimate the impact, on cases and deaths, of interventions including testing, contact tracing, lockdown, curfew and vaccination. Our model is based on collation, with agents performing activities and moving between locations accordingly. The model is highly heterogeneous, featuring spatial clustering, over 2000 behavioural types and a 10 minute time resolution. The model is validated against COVID-19 clinical monitoring data collected in Luxembourg in 2020. Our model predicts far fewer cases and deaths than the equivalent equation-based SEIR model. In particular, with R-0 = 2.45, the SEIR model infects 87% of the resident population while our agent-based model infects only around 23% of the resident population. Our simulations suggest that testing and contract tracing reduce cases substantially, but are less effective at reducing deaths. Lockdowns are very effective although costly, while the impact of an 11pm-6am curfew is relatively small. When vaccinating against a future outbreak, our results suggest that herd immunity can be achieved at relatively low coverage, with substantial levels of protection achieved with only 30% of the population fully immune. When vaccinating in the midst of an outbreak, the challenge is more difficult. In this context, we investigate the impact of vaccine efficacy, capacity, hesitancy and strategy. We conclude that, short of a permanent lockdown, vaccination is by far the most effective way to suppress and ultimately control the spread of COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:51
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [11] Burzynski M., 2020, COVID 19 CRISIS MANA
  • [12] Calafiore GC, 2020, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P3889, DOI 10.1109/CDC42340.2020.9304142
  • [13] Chao D.L., 2020, MODELING LAYERED NON, DOI [10.1101/2020.04.08.20058487, DOI 10.1101/2020.04.08.20058487]
  • [14] Chen Jiangzhuo, 2021, medRxiv, DOI 10.1101/2021.02.04.21251012
  • [15] Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics
    Davies, Nicholas G.
    Klepac, Petra
    Liu, Yang
    Prem, Kiesha
    Jit, Mark
    Eggo, Rosalind M.
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2020, 26 (08) : 1205 - +
  • [16] Inferring change points in the spread of COVID-19 reveals the effectiveness of interventions
    Dehning, Jonas
    Zierenberg, Johannes
    Spitzner, F. Paul
    Wibral, Michael
    Pinheiro Neto, Joao
    Wilczek, Michael
    Priesemann, Viola
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2020, 369 (6500) : 160 - +
  • [17] del Arbol PMR., 2020, COMP EPIDEMIC CONTRO, DOI [10.1101/2020.05.24.20111625, DOI 10.1101/2020.05.24.20111625]
  • [18] Djanatliev A., 2020, MODELING EXIT STRATE, DOI 10.1101/2020.04.14.20063750
  • [19] To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic
    Eikenberry, Steffen E.
    Mancuso, Marina
    Iboi, Enahoro
    Phan, Tin
    Eikenberry, Keenan
    Kuang, Yang
    Kostelich, Eric
    Gumel, Abba B.
    [J]. INFECTIOUS DISEASE MODELLING, 2020, 5 : 293 - 308
  • [20] Epstein JM, 1996, Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up