Adapting Service Delivery during COVID-19: Experiences of Domestic Violence Practitioners

被引:39
作者
Cortis, Natasha [1 ]
Smyth, Ciara [1 ]
Valentine, Kylie [1 ]
Breckenridge, Jan [2 ]
Cullen, Patricia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Social Policy Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Social Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Populat Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
Australia; COVID-19; domestic violence services; practitioners; service access; technology; HURRICANE KATRINA;
D O I
10.1093/bjsw/bcab105
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
COVID-19 rapidly altered patterns of domestic and family violence, increasing the complexity of women's needs, and presenting new barriers to service use. This article examines service responses in Australia, exploring practitioners' accounts of adapting service delivery models in the early months of the pandemic. Data from a qualitatively enriched online survey of practitioners (n = 100) show the ways services rapidly shifted to engage with clients via remote, technology-mediated modes, as physical distancing requirements triggered rapid expansion in the use of phone, email, video calls and messaging, and many face-to-face interventions temporarily ceased. Many practitioners and service managers found that remote service delivery improved accessibility and efficiency. Others expressed concerns about their capacity to assess risk without face-to-face contact, and were unsure whether new service modalities would meet the needs of all client groups and reflect best practice. Findings attest to practitioners' mixed experiences during this period of rapid service innovation and change, and underline the importance of monitoring emerging approaches to establish which service adaptations are effective for different groups of people, and to determine good practice for combining remote and face-to-face service options in the longer term.
引用
收藏
页码:1779 / 1798
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Allen-Ebrahimian B., 2020, AXIOS
  • [2] Alon T. M., 2020, IMPACT COVID 19 GEND, DOI [DOI 10.3386/W26947, 10.3386/w26947]
  • [3] Arenas-Arroyo E., 2020, IZA DISCUSSION PAPER
  • [4] Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challenges and responses
    Banks, Sarah
    Cai, Tian
    de Jonge, Ed
    Shears, Jane
    Shum, Michelle
    Sobocan, Ana M.
    Strom, Kim
    Truell, Rory
    Uriz, Maria Jesus
    Weinberg, Merlinda
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 63 (05) : 569 - 583
  • [5] Is Physical Proximity Essential to the Psychoanalytic Process? An Exploration Through the Lens of Skype?
    Bayles, Mary
    [J]. PSYCHOANALYTIC DIALOGUES, 2012, 22 (05) : 569 - 585
  • [6] Bazeley P., 2018, Integrating analyses in mixed methods research
  • [7] Boxall H., 2020, PREVALENCE DOMESTIC
  • [8] The online survey as aqualitativeresearch tool
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    Boulton, Elicia
    Davey, Louise
    McEvoy, Charlotte
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 24 (06) : 641 - 654
  • [9] Lessons from the Transition to Relational Teletherapy During COVID-19
    Burgoyne, Nancy
    Cohn, Aaron Samuel
    [J]. FAMILY PROCESS, 2020, 59 (03) : 974 - 988
  • [10] Relationship-based social work and electronic communication technologies: anticipation, adaptation and achievement
    Byrne, Julie
    Kirwan, Gloria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2019, 33 (02) : 217 - 232